Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
Now this settlement system was able to render an important service to
American industry during the demobilization. Many of the contractors
had gone to the limit of their resources in procuring buildings,
machinery, materials, and work in the prosecution of their contracts.
As long as production was continuing, the Government could finance the
expansion by making advance payments to the cost-plus contractors and
by advancing money to others through the War Credits Board. But when
the contracts were terminated, the Government could no longer follow
this financing system, and the contractors faced a period of months
or even years before they could conclude their settlements with the
Government. During all that time their invested money would be tied
up. Some of the more deeply involved--and large concerns they were,
too--were perilously near actual bankruptcy as a result.
For the relief of such producers the War Department continued in
demobilization its plan of advance payments, with, of course, a
difference. Before the armistice the Government, in making advance
payments, paid a percentage of the cost of work actually done. After
the armistice no work to speak of was being done; yet in practically
all the settlements there were numerous items of cost admittedly
legitimate and about which there was no dispute. These were such items
as materials in sight, appraised, and invoiced to the War Department,
and such items as the contractor’s obligations to his subcontractors.
The War Department adopted the policy of making payments in advance of
final settlement up to 75 per cent of its admitted obligations. These
payments, amounting in all to more than $143,000,000, enabled the
producers to tide over the period between the termination of work and
the final settlement with the Government. The practice of maintaining
officers of the Finance Service as members of the district claims
boards facilitated the prompt payment of these advances. In the final
settlements, of course, the Government subtracted from the amounts due
from it to the producers all advances made to them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account