Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
The mere size of the war ordnance industry would have made the problem
of its demobilization a great one, but it was also complicated with
peculiar difficulties. The production of most ordnance materials
differed radically from that of any articles known in normal American
industry. The Quartermaster Department procured for the Army food,
clothing, shoes, hand tools, and many other supplies which, though
they were frequently of special design, nevertheless were not much
unlike the sorts of commodities with which the contractors were already
familiar. The Engineer Corps used many materials commonly employed in
the peaceful pursuits. Outside of ordnance, the manufacture of aircraft
alone took our industries into virgin fields of endeavor.
Therefore, those factories which were making for the Army products
essentially similar to products consumed by the civilian population,
were ready after the armistice to resume their places in normal
commerce with slight internal adjustment. But the ordnance
factories--they were a different story. In ordnance production the
war had witnessed some factory conversions of the most violent sort.
Manufacturers of printing presses built gun carriages of new and
difficult design; makers of sewing machines and automobiles undertook
the difficult task of producing hydropneumatic recuperators for
absorbing the recoil of field guns; producers of typewriters and water
meters manufactured time fuses for shell; women’s cloak factories sewed
silk powder bags; a phonograph maker produced aërial bomb sights; and
one producer turned from the modern business of making corsets and took
up the ancient occupation of tentmaker. For nearly all these factories
the ordnance contracts virtually implied the physical reëquipment of
their plants for quite different manufacturing processes. For them,
too, demobilization meant a not less severe dislocation of equipment
and processes in changing back again to their former work.
It was the problem of the Ordnance Department after the armistice to
manage the liquidation of its great war business--to halt the work, to
dispose of raw materials and materials left half completed when the
wheels stopped, to do something with the special factories and even
the complete towns built by the Government or for the Government in
the prosecution of the war enterprise, to recoup the millions advanced
to finance the ordnance producers, and finally to settle with cash
the obligations of the Government to the producers incurred when the
contracts were terminated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account