Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
The total production of the metallic elements of artillery shell, both
before and after the armistice, recorded some totals of fantastic
size. It should be remembered that for the most part our war shell
were of the European nose-fuse type and therefore unlike any shell
which the War Department had ever produced before. An apparently simple
manufacturing proposition turned out to be a most difficult one,
particularly in the production of two small but important elements
of the nose-fuse shell, the booster, which accelerates the rate of
explosion, and the adapter, which holds the booster in place. It was
months before our manufacturers could produce boosters and adapters
successfully, but then the effort came along with a rush. When
production ceased the Ordnance Department had 26,000,000 boosters and
adapters to dispose of. Other surpluses for salvage were 60,000,000
shell forgings, 60,000,000 shell machinings, 60,000,000 cannon
cartridge cases, nearly 70,000,000 metal parts for grenades, and over
6,000,000 metal parts for trench mortar shell.
The demobilization policy was to store reserves of shell sufficient to
meet the consumption of an army of 1,000,000 men during six months of
active field service. In the 75-millimeter size, for instance, such
a reserve meant 2,500,000 shell. Since we had produced 15,000,000
75-millimeter shell, it is evident that the Ordnance Department found
on its hands 12,500,000 such shell to be disposed of in some way.
Surpluses in other sizes were also large. The steel strike of the
autumn of 1919 occurred opportunely for those disposing of the excess
shell, for it enabled the surplus metal to be sold at good prices
as melting scrap. A brisk demand for shell and cartridge cases as
souvenirs also absorbed a surprisingly large quantity of the excess
materials.
As in the demobilization of the artillery industry, here in the
shell-making industry we see at work the same preparedness policy of
designating established arsenals and retained stand-by plants to be a
manufacturing reserve against some future war emergency. Frankford and
Picatinny arsenals were selected to inherit the shell-making facilities
created in private plants during the war. At Frankford Arsenal was
concentrated an equipment able to manufacture daily 6,000 shell,
ranging from 75 millimeters to 240 millimeters. The Frankford shell
plant was made a complete unit, capable of taking billet steel, forging
out the shell blanks, machining them, and turning out shell ready for
loading. At Picatinny Arsenal was created an experimental shell plant
with a daily capacity of 300 shell of all sizes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account