Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
We may pause here, too, to correct another misapprehension which has
had some currency: namely, that not only was a billion shamefully
wasted on aircraft but it was wasted by the so-called dollar-a-year men
called to Washington and placed in charge of the aircraft program. The
only dollar-a-year men connected with that program in a conspicuous
capacity were the civilian members of the Aircraft Board--Mr. Howard
E. Coffin, chairman, and Messrs. Richard F. Howe and Harry B. Thayer,
the other two members. But the Aircraft Board was advisory only in
function and possessed absolutely no administrative or executive
powers. It acted as a clearing house in the effort to coördinate the
aircraft production of the War and Navy departments. The actual work
of procuring aircraft--designing, contracting for, inspecting, and
receiving materials--was always in the hands of the uniformed services.
The Aircraft Board had no control of the spending of appropriations,
except that of the relatively insignificant appropriation of $100,000
granted to it by Congress to cover its office expenses.
The industry which wrote the records of aircraft production was
attaining great momentum when the armistice was signed, although it
had not yet reached capacity production. It had, however, in the
final thirty-one days of active hostilities, produced 1,582 airplanes
(1,081 of which were De Haviland service planes for use in France),
5,177 engines (of which 3,034 were Liberty engines), and 249 kite
balloons. The business of terminating this industry was difficult.
The liquidation plan adopted was essentially like that used by the
Ordnance Department. Before the armistice the production branch of
the Air Service was organized into eight manufacturing districts,
with headquarters respectively at Boston, Buffalo, Chicago, Dayton,
Detroit, New York, Pittsburg, and San Francisco. Five thousand persons
were employed by the district organizations. After the armistice the
district production boards became district claims boards for the Air
Service, and they conducted most of the actual work of terminating
production and arranging settlements with the contractors. Their
settlements went up for approval, first, to the Air Service Claims
Board and, finally, to the War Department Claims Board.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account