Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
After that came the public. Private dealers were permitted to bid on
lots of supplies. Regular days were set apart for the sale of various
classes of commodities: Monday, textiles and leather goods; Tuesday,
raw materials, machinery, and engineering supplies; Wednesday, general
supplies; Thursday, medical supplies and motor vehicles; Friday,
clothing; and Saturday, food supplies. These bidding sales were widely
advertised, in advance, and bids could be submitted either to the War
Department in Washington or to any of the zone, or district, supply
offices. The private consumer could buy army food, clothing, textiles,
tools, and other commodities of household utility either by parcel post
(through the coöperation of the Post Office Department) or at any of
the Army’s retail stores, a great chain of which was set up throughout
the country.
By sales and transfers the Army, at the end of the first year
of effort, had disposed of supplies originally procured under
the administration of the Director of Purchase to the value of
$357,000,000. The transfers and sales brought back to the War
Department more than seventy-seven cents of every dollar originally
expended in the production of these goods. The story of the ingenuity
displayed by the Government’s officers in selling these and other
surplus supplies (particularly the surpluses in the hands of the
Ordnance Department and the Air Service after the armistice) is left
for another chapter.
Before dropping the subject of the demobilization of the quartermaster
war business, however, we should not overlook the disposition of the
horses and mules acquired by the Army, but not shipped to France.
The Remount Service purchased about 308,000 animals during the war.
It started the war with about 90,000 animals on hand. The war losses
amounted to 33,000 animals. Approximately 68,000 were shipped to
France. Thus, at the time of the armistice the Remount Service had in
its stables and corrals nearly 300,000 horses and mules. About 215,000
of these were declared surplus and sold, and the rest were retained for
the permanent Army.
The decision of the Remount Service to sell 200,000 animals on
the market as rapidly as the market could absorb them was roundly
criticized by horsemen, who pointed out that normally the American
market had never absorbed more than 60,000 horses and mules in a year.
The result would be, the critics declared, that the Government would
get fair prices for the first 50,000 or 60,000 animals offered, and
after that the surplus animals would be a drag on the market, not
only forcing the Government to stand a great financial loss, but so
depressing prices that dealers everywhere would suffer. On the other
hand, it was costing the Government a dollar a day to feed and care for
each of these animals. By retarding the sales the Government might be
able to get better prices, but the gain would be more than absorbed by
the cost of maintaining the establishment in the meantime.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive