Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
Although as these words are written it is more than two and a half
years since the armistice of November 11, 1918, was signed, it is
still impossible to give a clean-cut and definitive statement of the
accomplishments of the industrial demobilization. It may never be
possible to do so. Although in the main it was possible to terminate
the war contracts with supplementary agreements fixing the Government’s
liability to the penny, the consolidation of these agreements would
not give the full cost of the termination. A few claimants are
stubborn and insist upon the ultimate legal redress guaranteed them
by the terms of their contracts. The administration in Washington has
changed, and some few of the claims once settled--as it was believed,
finally--are being reopened. And then, on the credit side of the war
ledger there is the same indefiniteness. Surpluses of war supplies are
indeterminate--expanding or contracting as policies change, as the
military establishment finds need of materials once declared surplus,
as war reserves deteriorate. Thus it is impossible to draw a line and
say that all transactions on the one side should be entered in the war
account and all on the other in the account of the permanent Army.
But in one important branch of our war industry there was a complete,
definite liquidation. The red line was drawn and the balance struck.
This was the branch in which the Allies and other foreign nations
were participants, as either buyers or sellers. The promptness with
which this transaction was consummated, and the completeness of
it--down to the last dollar due, down to the last pound of materials
exchanged--mark it as one of the outstanding accomplishments in the
whole industrial record of the war. Its benefits to the countries
affected are not to be read entirely in the footings of the columns
of debits and offsets: rather, they are political and economic--the
prestige of the United States enhanced, international good will
sustained, irritation and ill feeling, which might easily have been
aroused among the late Allies and their associates in the settlement of
their business arrangements, avoided.
It is evident that these war transactions fell into two classes: one
class in which the Allies dealt (through the American Government) with
American industry for the production of supplies; the other in which
the United States was the customer, and the industries of the Allies
(and to a slight extent the industries of certain neutral nations) the
source of supply. And, as the business of terminating the arrangements
was thus a double-barreled proposition, the War Department found it
convenient to attack it with two agencies: the so-called Cuthell Board
(which, officially speaking, was the “Special Representative of the
Secretary of War” and his assistants) and the United States Liquidation
Commission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account