Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
It was impossible for the Liquidation Commission to make a lump
settlement of all the minor bills, accounts, and claims of Great
Britain against America, because of the difficulties in securing full
statements of the indebtedness. It was roughly estimated, however, that
these claims would aggregate £10,000,000.
One obscure and involved problem for the Commission to solve related
to the so-called British “hidden losses” on steel products sold to the
United States during the war. The British treatment and control of its
war prices differed radically in method from ours. The War Industries
Board, it will be remembered, fixed prices high enough to stimulate
production and then held the industries to those prices, no matter to
whom they sold. The British plan was an opposite one. With steel, for
instance, the British Government simply monopolized the raw materials
and sold them to the producers at prices that represented a loss to
the Government. In effect, it was a subsidy. To the British public it
made no difference whether it paid this subsidy or an equal amount
in the increased cost of artillery, ammunition, and other munitions
made of steel. But when it came to a settlement between England and
the United States, the British Government insisted that the United
States was not fairly entitled to the “manufacturers’ issues” price for
the raw steel that went into the British-made munitions supplied to
America. The British, therefore, after the main settlements, presented
a supplementary claim to compensate for the hidden loss, and this claim
amounted approximately to £3,770,000.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account