The other work on which Erasmus spent most of his time in England was
his share in a new edition of St. Jerome, which was being brought
out by the great printing house of Froben at Basel. It will be more
in order, perhaps, to speak of this when we have followed Erasmus
to the Continent and seen him established in the full career of an
editor and author which was to occupy the remainder of his life. It
may not be out of place here to quote his own description of the
principles which governed him in his editorial work. He was accused
of inaccuracy and undue haste in giving to the world the results of
unripe scholarship. He acknowledges the facts, but defends himself as
follows,[96] speaking at the moment of the epistles of Jerome:
[96] _Catalogus lucubrationum_, i.
"I gave such care to this work [the edition of 1524] that the
attentive reader may easily see that I did not undertake this
revision in vain. The control of ancient manuscripts was not
lacking, but these could not preclude the use of conjecture in
some places; but these conjectures I so modified in the notes
that they could not easily deceive anyone, but could only
stimulate in the reader a zeal for investigation. And I hope it
may come to pass that someone equipped with more correct texts
may restore also those points which have escaped me. To these
I will gladly render the praise due to their industry and they
will have no reason to find fault with my attempts; for while I
have been fortunate in restoring many points, in some I have
been compelled to follow the ancient proverb:--'not as we would,
but as we can.'
"For there are men of such a disposition that if they can add
anything to the efforts of their predecessors, they claim all
the praise for themselves and make a tremendous fuss if one
has even nodded at any point or not accomplished what one has
undertaken. I know not whether we ought to despise more the
rudeness of such persons or their ingratitude. No one stands in
their way, if they wish to produce something better. They say
that nothing ought to be published that is not perfect. Now,
whoever says that, simply says that nothing at all should be
published; nor was ever anything properly edited down to the
present day. I was editing these things for Batavians, for monks
and theologians, who were for the most part without classic
learning; for liberal study had not yet penetrated so far as
these.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account