Despotism and Democracy: A Study in Washington Society and PoliticsSeawell, Molly Elliot
General
Despotism and Democracy: A Study in Washington Society and Politics
Seawell, Molly Elliot
Political fiction; Washington (D.C.) -- Fiction
On the fifteenth of April Congress met for one of the most exciting
sessions in the history of the country. There was excitement both for
the members and for the public. Usually, when great economic questions
have to be disposed of, which rack the intelligence of the strongest
men in the House and Senate, which make and unmake Presidents and
policies, at which men work like slaves toiling at the oar, by night as
well as by day, and of which the harvest of death is grimly reckoned
beforehand, the people go on quietly, reading with calm indifference
the proceedings of Congress in the newspapers or skipping them because
of their dulness. When questions affecting the honour and prestige of
the country arise, the American people, justly described as “strong,
resolute, and ofttimes violent,” become deeply agitated, are swayed all
one way by the same mighty impulse, and force Congress to act as the
people wish. The Congress at these times is calm. There is nothing to
do but comply with the mandates of the people. One party is as willing
to vote supplies as another. All march together. The march would become
a wild storming party but for a few cool heads and obstructives, who
act as a brake, and keep the pace down to something reasonable and the
policies in the middle of the road. But the brake is powerless to stop
the march onward.
At this session, though, there were to be things to agitate both
the people and the Congress. The question of peace or war had to be
decided; and if it were peace, as the cooler heads foresaw, it would be
peace on such stupendous terms of power and prestige to this country
that it might be impossible to deal sanely with the great economic
problems which were like the rumblings of an earthquake, and were
liable to produce vast convulsions. For the present, however, economic
questions were in the background, the Committee on Foreign Affairs was
the most prominent one in the House.
It almost cured Crane of his infatuation for Washington society to
see how little it was impressed by the large events waiting to burst
from under the great white dome on the hill. Himself, in a fever heat
of suppressed excitement, he felt aggrieved that dinners still went
on unflaggingly, that the first long season of grand opera Washington
had ever known was about to begin, and claimed much attention. None of
these smart people seemed to care in the least that he was to present
the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs in an unprecedentedly
short time--a report which might mean war or peace. He expressed his
sense of personal injury to Thorndyke as the two sat hard at work in
their committee-room one night a week after the meeting of Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account