Dialogues of the DeadLyttelton, George Lyttelton, Baron
Philosophy
Dialogues of the Dead
Lyttelton, George Lyttelton, Baron
Dialogues, English -- Early works to 1800; Imaginary conversations
_Aristides_.--Why was the command not given to Phocion, whose abilities
had been proved on so many other occasions? Was it offered to him, and
did he refuse to accept it? You are silent, Demosthenes. I understand
your silence. You are unwilling to tell me that, having the power, by
your influence over the people, to confer the command on what Athenian
you pleased, you were induced, by the spirit of party, to lay aside a
great general who had been always successful, who had the chief
confidence of your troops and of your allies, in order to give it to men
zealous indeed for your measures and full of military ardour, but of
little capacity or experience in the conduct of a war. You cannot plead
that, if Phocion had led your troops against Philip, there was any danger
of his basely betraying his trust. Phocion could not be a traitor. You
had seen him serve the Republic and conquer for it in wars, the
undertaking of which he had strenuously opposed, in wars with Philip. How
could you then be so negligent of the safety of your country as not to
employ him in this, the most dangerous of all she ever had waged? If
Chares and Lysicles, the two generals you chose to conduct it, had
commanded the Grecian forces at Marathon and Plataea we should have lost
those battles. All the men whom you sent to fight the Macedonians under
such leaders were victims to the animosity between you and Phocion, which
made you deprive them of the necessary benefit of his wise direction.
This I think the worst blemish of your administration. In other parts of
your conduct I not only acquit but greatly applaud and admire you. With
the sagacity of a most consummate statesman you penetrated the deepest
designs of Philip, you saw all the dangers which threatened Greece from
that quarter while they were yet at a distance, you exhorted your
countrymen to make a timely provision for their future security, you
spread the alarm through all the neighbouring states, you combined the
most powerful in a confederacy with Athens, you carried the war out of
Attica, which (let Phocion say what he will) was safer than meeting it
there, you brought it, after all that had been done by the enemy to
strengthen himself and weaken us, after the loss of Amphipolis, Olynthus,
and Potidaea, the outguards of Athens, you brought it, I say, to the
decision of a battle with equal forces. When this could be effected
there was evidently nothing so desperate in our circumstances as to
justify an inaction which might probably make them worse, but could not
make them better. Phocion thinks that a state which cannot itself be the
strongest should live in friendship with that power which is the
strongest. But in my opinion such friendship is no better than
servitude. It is more advisable to endeavour to supply what is wanting
in our own strength by a conjunction with others who are equally in
danger. This method of preventing the ruin of our country was tried by
Demosthenes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account