[62] From _kobu_ 'to flatter.' An abbreviation of _kobita kotoba_, and used to indicate refined speech; i.e., that speech containing Chinese borrowings. See Doi Tadao, _Kirishitan gogaku no kenkyū_ (Tokyo, 1942, pp. 67-70). The term is also found in the introduction to the _Vocabulario_ in the expression _palauras Cobitas_. [63] The text reads _De pronomine secundae personae_.... [64] This list, unquestionably derived from the _Arte_ (67v), has been in several ways confounded. The _mi_ is out of order and the second _vare_ is clearly in error. If we put aside the genitive forms from Rodriguez' list, the first four forms should be _vare_, _varera_, _vatacuxi_, and _soregaxi_. Rodriguez' second set consists of _mi_, _midomo_, and _midomora_. We would suggest that Collado meant to include _ura_, which is listed by Rodriguez as the genitive form _vraga_. I offer _vatacuxi_, _soregaxi_, _vare_, _varera_, _mi_, _midomo_, _midomora_, and _ura_ as the intended list, with the order of _mi_ and _varera_ reversed to accommodate the sentence which follows. [65] The forms for the second person are derived from the _Arte_ (68). Throughout this section the accent marks are quite erratic. In several places, for example, Collado has _sónata_ and even _sónatá_. [66] In the material which follows Collado has brought together items from several sections of the _Arte_; for the interrogatives see (65-65v), the indefinites (66), and the demonstratives (68). [67] These reduplicated forms are not derived from Rodriguez' description and are apparently misstatements of the forms _care_ and _are_ which would otherwise be missing. [68] An abbreviated form of _monomósu_; cf. _Arte_ (139v). [69] Collado is here speaking with reference to the normal order in Latin. [70] The treatment of the verbal system by Collado follows in a general way the _Arte_ (6v-54v). In the material that follows specific references will be made when a comparison of the two works is suggested. [71] The text has _secundae coniugationis_. This error, which is repeated throughout the text, is not present in the Spanish manuscript. [72] The text again has _secundae coniugationis_. [73] This list covering the _Kami-ichidan_ and _Kami-nidan_ verbs is derived from a similarly defined sub-group of the first conjugation in the _Arte_ (28). Since the verbs _cabi_, _sabi_, and _deqi_ are in no way indicated as extraordinary in Rodriguez' presentation, I have amended the text to include their present tense form. [74] The text reads for this gloss _fucore afficior_. The proper word is _mucore_ 'mould,' with the literal translation being 'I am affected by mould.' [75] The _Dictionarium_ has this verb listed as _kami-nidan_, _xij_, _uru_, and therefore not exceptional. [76] Cf. _Arte_ (7) where a similar list is presented. [77] For the source of Collado's description of the future tense cf. _Arte_ (7v). [78] The text reads _secundae coniugationis_.