[100] The text reads _cú vaau ni voite va_, with the errata changing the verb to _cuvazu_. [101] This historically inaccurate rule is derived from the _Arte_ (18v). [102] In the one example of this construction, on page 62, Collado has the form _tovazunba_. [103] The original is in the _soro_ style; _Iǒjǒni voiteua uquetori mǒsubequ soro._ [104] Cf. _Arte_ (19v). [105] Here and throughout the section Collado transcribes as _ro_ the potential particle which should correctly be written _ró_ (cf. _Arte_, 11v). It will be noticed that all but one instance of the 'open o' on p. 35 of the text has been left unmarked. [106] Collado has derived this list from the _Arte_ (45-47). His terminology is, however, rather misleading. What he classifies as _verba irregularia_ are those which Rodriguez considers deponent, that is _verbo defectiuo_, with the term _verbo irregular_ being used by Rodriguez for the adjective. Given this misunderstanding Collado begins his list with an explanation of the irregularities of _qi,uru_. This verb is on Rodriguez' list only because "it lacks certain forms in the affirmative" (45v). Rodriguez has a list of 43 deponent verbs, beginning with _tari_, from which Collado has selected the first 14 and then a few from the remainder. [107] In the restricted context of an adjectival; cf. modern _arayuru koto_. [108] Cf. _Arte_ (45v) where Rodriguez transcribes _vreyeyo_. [109] Loc. cit. Rodriguez presents _vreôru_ as an alternative form for _vreô_ in the present tense and then selects that variant for the infinitive. [110] Formation (_formatio_) is to be understood here in the sense of derivation, and diversity (_differentia_) in the sense of class membership. [111] The opening paragraphs of this section follow the _Arte_ (68-70 and 96-108v). The list of particles, beginning with _maraxi_, follows 160-168. [112] The text, here and in the next sentence, reads _secundae coningationis_. [113] The form _dojucu_ is incorrect. It is taken by Ōtsuka to be _dōshuku_ 'a person living in the same house.' The _Vocabulario_ records the item _dôjucu_ 'a young boy who serves a priest.' _Dôjucu_ best fits Collado's translation. [114] The text again reads _secundae coniugationis_. [115] Cf. _Arte_ (160-164) from which this list and the following material have been derived. [116] Throughout his treatment of the respect language Collado glosses his verb forms in the first person, even though that translation might be inappropriate to any context. [117] Rodriguez (_Arte_, 162v) specifies the distribution of _vo_ and _go_, using _gosacu atta_ as his example of the construction in context of a Chinese vocabulary item. Collado does not refer to this distinction. [118] The text reads _secundae coniugationis_. [119] The text reads _secundae coniugationis_. [120] Ōtsuka (1957) suggests _maraxi_ is correct and alters the example. Since the list begins with _maraxi_, I assume the error to be in the citation.