[121] The material for this section is derived from the _Arte_ (164v-168). [122] While the material for this section is drawn from various sections of the _Arte_, the bulk of the particles and their descriptions are derived from Rodriguez' treatment of postpositional (73-77) and adverbial constructions (112v-125). [123] Rodriguez' list (77v) runs as follows; _vchi_, _voi_, _faxe_, _ai_, _tori_, _mexi_, _tçui_, and _voxi_. On the basis of Collado's examples _voxi_ should have been included in his list. [124] Collado's transcription _qinpen_ is phonemically correct while being phonetically less accurate than Rodriguez' _quimpen_. [125] Collado has altered Rodriguez' version from _Nippon_, even though the _Dictionarium_ glosses _consuetudo japonica_ as _Nippon catagui_. [126] Collado, in the _Dictionarium_ and here, prefers _mmu_ to _uma_. [127] This particle is not described in the _Arte_. [128] Rodriguez (_Arte_, 116) records _Core coso yocarǒzure_ and states that in this context _coso_ has the same meaning as _Queccu_ and _Cayette_. [129] Cf. the _Arte_ (117) where the list is given as _Reba_, _Ni_, _Tomo_, the potential, and _Te_. [130] Rodriguez' version runs _Iesu Christo fitono vontocoroua_. (For Collado's use of _reduplicatiuus_ see note 53.) [131] As the first example indicates, the _zzu_ variant is not restricted to the negative preterit, but is the form which appears for _da_ in all contexts, as here with the preterit of _iomu_. [132] In the absence of other examples it is not possible to determine if Collado assumed the present tense form to be _iuru_ or _uru_. The correction here follows the spelling used consistently in the _Arte_. [133] Both Collado and Rodriguez agree that verbs ending in _tai_ govern the accusative case; cf. _Nanigaxiuo yobitai_ (_Arte_, 14v). [134] The text reads _secunda persona_. [135] Rodriguez has _Vatacuxiua nantomo buchôfôde tofǒ ga gozanai_ [... _buchôfǒde_ ...]. [136] Rodriguez uses the transcription _gorǒjerarei_ in the example from which this sentence is derived. (The ten other occurrences in the _Arte_ have _goran_.) The _Dictionarium_ uses only _goron_, while the _Vocabulario_ lists both _goran_ and _goron_. The Spanish manuscript has _goran_. [137] Rodriguez has _mairade canauanu_. [138] The _Arte_ has the plain form _mairǒcotode attaredomo_. [139] The _Arte_ has _mairumajiqueredomo_. [140] Perhaps an attempt to follow the rule, established in the syntax below, that states the _v_ of the accusative particle is lost after _n_. If this is the intent, the comma is in error. [141] Rodriguez treats adverbs in two sections of the _Arte_; under the parts of speech (73v-77), and under the syntax (113-125). As has been observed in the introduction, there is little consistancy of classification between Rodriguez and Collado in this area of grammatical description.