[182] Collado here demonstrates the absorbitive capacity of Latin as he creates an accusative singular adjective from the past attributive of the verb _kobu_. [183] The use of _abiru_, where one would expect _aburu_, may be a simple typographical error or evidence that Collado accepted the shift from _ni-dan_ to _ichi-dan katsuyō_ as unworthy of notice. Rodriguez (_Arte_, 101v) has _midzuuo aburu_. [184] This list is derived from the _Arte_ (101v-102v). From _abi,uru_ on, the list is in the same order as that made by Rodriguez. _Fanaruru_, _zzuru_, _nosquru_, _noru_, _vovaru_, and _mairu_ are Collado's contributions. [185] Cf. _Arte_ (101v). [186] Cf. _Arte_ (100). [187] Cf. _Arte_ (98). [188] Cf. _Arte_ (104). [189] Cf. _Arte_ (64 and 79). [190] The material presented in this section is gleaned from the exhaustive treatment of the numerical system which makes up the last 20 leaves of Rodriguez' grammar. [191] This compound does not follow the rule, since _cu_ is not a _iomi_ numeral. See also _cu ninai_ below. [192] Rodriguez has _fitoi_ or _fifitoi_ (Arte, 228v). [193] While this form fits the general rule for combining counters and days, Rodriguez (_Arte_, 228v) has _tǒca_, which is a misprint for _tôca_, cf. Doi, _Daibunten_, p. 818. [194] Spelled with a tilde, _sãguat_, as are all the other forms before _guat_. [195] For the _sǒ_ and _sa_ allomorph of _san_ cf. _Arte_ (173v). [196] Rodriguez gives the following equivalents in the monetary system on 217-217v of the _Arte_: ... ten _Rin_ in one _Fun_, ten _Fun_ in one _Momme_, one thousand _Momme_ in one _Quamme_. [197] The text is confused at this point. It runs: Ixxacu, _unus palmus seu tertia quam Hispania vocant_ sanjacu. _tres_, ... [198] The text has _culus_ 'posterior,' but the errata changes the word to _anus_. The original seems closer to the Japanese. [199] The examples here lag one behind the glosses. [200] Here and elsewhere Collado combines homophonous enumerators which Rodriguez keeps distinct. Cf. _Arte_ (220-223v) for an extensive list of enumerators. [201] Cf. _Arte_ (159-159v). [202] This rule, apparently an invention of Collado's, has no precedent in Rodriguez or in linguistic derivation. The _n_ in this construction is the contracted form of the classical _mu_, the source for what Collado calls the future. [203] These forms might better have been presented as _nari,i_ and _qeri,i_ to indicate that the sentence-ending forms are _nari_ and _qeri_. * * * * * Corrections made to printed original. p. 14. `BOOK II. The Rudamenta' corrected to `Rudimenta'. Ib. `While the Arts Grammaticae presents ...' corrected to `Ars Grammaticae'. p. 16. `booklet which teaches Canaduzcai' changed to much other uses as `Canadzucai'. p. 17. `Tassuru, taxxita, taxxeò ...' the last amended to match the paradigm `taxxeô'. p. 19. `Motoneô.' in future column, amended to fit the paradigm `Motomeô'.