[169] This item is the only one in this paragraph which Rodriguez does not list as a _casane cotoba_ on 134v of the _Arte_. Collado is apparently interpreting this construction as a repetition of two adverbs, as for example _coco caxico_. If so, the form should be spelled _vomoxirô_, _vocaxiú_ (if we follow his rule for the formation of adverbs from _ij_ ending adjectives). However, the form which he seems to be recording is more likely the compound adverb which is listed in the _Vocabulario_ as _vomoxirovocaxǔ_ and glossed as _contemporizando de boa maneira_ 'temporizing in a carefree manner.' The spelling that we suggest is derived from the attested lexical item without the application of Collado's formational rules. [170] Cf. _Arte_ (125-130v). [171] This interjection, together with _hat_ below, are the only uses of initial _h_ found in the description. Rodriguez transcribes the latter item as _at_ or _vat_ (_Arte_, 127) which suggests a close relationship between the labial and glottal aspirates. [172] Rodriguez has _Benquei satemo yasaxij yatçubaraya_. [173] Rodriguez has: ... _nituaye bǒno saxivorosu_. The entire passage would be, 'Benkei, seeing this, thought, "Oh, this isn't very important," and dropped the stick into the garden.' which Rodriguez explains to mean being sorry for not paying sufficient attention to a matter. [174] The material for this section is derived from various sections in Book II of the _Arte_. [175] Matthew, 6:24. [176] Rodriguez has the spelling _touazumba_. In transcribing the form Collado failed to follow the rule he established in his treatment of conditional constructions. [177] The model for this sentence appears to be _Arte_ (62): _Ichidan medzuraxij yenoco, que nagǒ, uquino gotoqu xirǒ_ [_sic_], _me curô, cauo icanimo airaxijuo cureta._ If this is the source of Collado's example, he is clearly demonstrating his sensitivity to the nasalization of such items such as _nagǒ_. The _Dictionarium_ under _longus_ has _nagai_. [178] Collado's transcription is unable accurately to express the proper phonological, or morphological, form of _shin'i_ 'indignation.' He would have been well advised to follow Rodriguez' model and transcribe this item as _xiny_ with the specification that consonant plus _y_ indicates a morphological juncture. [179] Rodriguez has the spelling _Quiso_, which agrees with the _Amakusaban Heike_ (p. 239), the ultimate source of the sentence. Collado's spelling in the translation is _quiuzo_. The Spanish manuscript has _Kiso_. [180] One might expect the more literal 'I do not believe that it will be finished,' but Collado has _credo quod non finietur_. [181] This rule, which might more appropriately have been included with the phonology, is not followed in Collado's description, with the possible exception of p. 48 where the same construction is apparently used.