Discourses on Satire and on Epic PoetryDryden, John
History
Discourses on Satire and on Epic Poetry
Dryden, John
Epic poetry; Satire; Satire -- History and criticism
I have yet a word or two to say of Virgil’s machines, from my own
observation of them. He has imitated those of Homer, but not copied
them. It was established long before this time, in the Roman religion as
well as in the Greek, that there were gods, and both nations for the most
part worshipped the same deities, as did also the Trojans (from whom the
Romans, I suppose, would rather be thought to derive the rites of their
religion than from the Grecians, because they thought themselves
descended from them). Each of those gods had his proper office, and the
chief of them their particular attendants. Thus Jupiter had in propriety
Ganymede and Mercury, and Juno had Iris. It was not for Virgil, then, to
Create new ministers; he must take what he found in his religion. It
cannot therefore be said that he borrowed them from Homer, any more than
from Apollo, Diana, and the rest, whom he uses as he finds occasion for
them, as the Grecian poet did; but he invents the occasions for which he
uses them. Venus, after the destruction of Troy, had gained Neptune
entirely to her party; therefore we find him busy in the beginning of the
“Æneis” to calm the tempest raised by Æolus, and afterwards conducting
the Trojan fleet to Cumes in safety, with the loss only of their pilot,
for whom he bargains. I name those two examples—amongst a hundred which
I omit—to prove that Virgil, generally speaking, employed his machines in
performing those things which might possibly have been done without them.
What more frequent than a storm at sea upon the rising of Orion? What
wonder if amongst so many ships there should one be overset, which was
commanded by Orontes, though half the winds had not been there which
Æolus employed? Might not Palinurus, without a miracle, fall asleep and
drop into the sea, having been over-wearied with watching, and secure of
a quiet passage by his observation of the skies? At least Æneas, who
knew nothing of the machine of Somnus, takes it plainly in this sense:—
“_O nimium coelo et pelago confise sereno_,
_Nudus in ignotâ_, _Palinure_, _jacebis arenâ_.”
But machines sometimes are specious things to amuse the reader, and give
a colour of probability to things otherwise incredible; and, besides, it
soothed the vanity of the Romans to find the gods so visibly concerned in
all the actions of their predecessors. We who are better taught by our
religion, yet own every wonderful accident which befalls us for the best,
to be brought to pass by some special providence of Almighty God, and by
the care of guardian angels; and from hence I might infer that no heroic
poem can be writ on the Epicurean principles, which I could easily
demonstrate if there were need to prove it or I had leisure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account