Discourses on Satire and on Epic PoetryDryden, John
History
Discourses on Satire and on Epic Poetry
Dryden, John
Epic poetry; Satire; Satire -- History and criticism
When Venus opens the eyes of her son Æneas to behold the gods who
combated against Troy in that fatal night when it was surprised, we share
the pleasure of that glorious vision (which Tasso has not ill copied in
the sacking of Jerusalem). But the Greeks had done their business though
neither Neptune, Juno, or Pallas had given them their divine assistance.
The most crude machine which Virgil uses is in the episode of Camilla,
where Opis by the command of her mistress kills Aruns. The next is in
the twelfth Æneid, where Venus cures her son Æneas. But in the last of
these the poet was driven to a necessity, for Turnus was to be slain that
very day; and Æneas, wounded as he was, could not have engaged him in
single combat unless his hurt had been miraculously healed and the poet
had considered that the dittany which she brought from Crete could not
have wrought so speedy an effect without the juice of ambrosia which she
mingled with it. After all, that his machine might not seem too violent,
we see the hero limping after Turnus; the wound was skinned, but the
strength of his thigh was not restored. But what reason had our author
to wound Æneas at so critical a time? And how came the cuishes to be
worse tempered than the rest of his armour, which was all wrought by
Vulcan and his journeymen? These difficulties are not easily to be
solved without confessing that Virgil had not life enough to correct his
work, though he had reviewed it and found those errors, which he resolved
to mend; but being prevented by death, and not willing to leave an
imperfect work behind him, he ordained by his last testament that his
“Æneis” should be burned. As for the death of Aruns, who was shot by a
goddess, the machine was not altogether so outrageous as the wounding
Mars and Venus by the sword of Diomede. Two divinities, one would have
thought, might have pleaded their prerogative of impassibility, or at
least not have been wounded by any mortal hand. Beside that, the ἴχωρ
which they shed was so very like our common blood that it was not to be
distinguished from it but only by the name and colour. As for what
Horace says in his “Art of Poetry,” that no machines are to be used
unless on some extraordinary occasion—
“_Nec deus intersit_, _nisi dignus vindice nodus_”—
that rule is to be applied to the theatre, of which he is then speaking,
and means no more than this—that when the knot of the play is to be
untied, and no other way is left for making the discovery, then, and not
otherwise, let a god descend upon a rope, and clear the business to the
audience. But this has no relation to the machines which are used in an
epic poem.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account