Discourses on Satire and on Epic PoetryDryden, John
History
Discourses on Satire and on Epic Poetry
Dryden, John
Epic poetry; Satire; Satire -- History and criticism
A man may be capable,
as Jack Ketch’s wife said of his servant, of a plain piece of work, a
bare hanging; but to make a malefactor die sweetly was only belonging to
her husband. I wish I could apply it to myself, if the reader would be
kind enough to think it belongs to me. The character of Zimri, in my
“Absalom” is, in my opinion, worth the whole poem; it is not bloody, but
it is ridiculous enough; and he for whom it was intended was too witty to
resent it as an injury. If I had railed, I might have suffered for it
justly; but I managed my own work more happily, perhaps more dexterously.
I avoided the mention of great crimes, and applied myself to the
representing of blind-sides and little extravagances; to which the
wittier a man is, he is generally the more obnoxious. It succeeded as I
wished; the jest went round, and he was laughed at in his turn who began
the frolic.
And thus, my lord, you see I have preferred the manner of Horace and of
your lordship in this kind of satire to that of Juvenal, and, I think,
reasonably. Holyday ought not to have arraigned so great an author for
that which was his excellency and his merit; or, if he did, on such a
palpable mistake he might expect that some one might possibly arise
(either in his own time, or after him) to rectify his error, and restore
to Horace that commendation of which he has so unjustly robbed him. And
let the manes of Juvenal forgive me if I say that this way of Horace was
the best for amending manners, as it is the most difficult. His was an
_ense rescindendum_; but that of Horace was a pleasant cure, with all the
limbs preserved entire, and, as our mountebanks tell us in their bills,
without keeping the patient within doors for a day. What they promise
only, Horace has effectually performed. Yet I contradict not the
proposition which I formerly advanced. Juvenal’s times required a more
painful kind of operation; but if he had lived in the age of Horace, I
must needs affirm that he had it not about him. He took the method which
was prescribed him by his own genius, which was sharp and eager; he could
not railly, but he could declaim: and as his provocations were great, he
has revenged them tragically. This, notwithstanding I am to say another
word which, as true as it is, will yet displease the partial admirers of
our Horace; I have hinted it before, but it is time for me now to speak
more plainly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account