Discourses on the First Decade of Titus LiviusMachiavelli, Niccolò
Philosophy
Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius
Machiavelli, Niccolò
Livy. Ab urbe condita; Political science -- Early works to 1800; Rome -- Historiography
Let us turn now to those republics which build fortresses not within
their own territories, but in towns whereof they have taken possession.
And if the above example of France and Genoa suffice not to show the
futility of this course, that of Florence and Pisa ought, I think, to
be conclusive. For in erecting fortresses to hold Pisa, the Florentines
failed to perceive that a city which had always been openly hostile to
them, which had lived in freedom, and which could cloak rebellion under
the name of liberty, must, if it were to be retained at all, be
retained by those methods which were used by the Romans, and either be
made a companion or be destroyed. Of how little service these Pisan
fortresses were, was seen on the coming of Charles VIII. of France into
Italy, to whom, whether through the treachery of their defenders or
from fear of worse evils, they were at once delivered up; whereas, had
there been no fortresses in Pisa, the Florentines would not have looked
to them as the means whereby the town was to be held; the king could
not by their assistance have taken the town from the Florentines; and
the methods whereby it had previously been preserved might, in all
likelihood, have continued sufficient to preserve it; and, at any rate,
had served that end no worse than the fortresses.
These, then, are the conclusions to which I come, namely, that
fortresses built to hold your own country under are hurtful, and that
those built to retain acquired territories are useless; and I am
content to rely on the example of the Romans, who in the towns they
sought to hold by the strong hand, rather pulled down fortresses than
built them. And if any, to controvert these views of mine, were to cite
the case of Tarentum in ancient times, or of Brescia in recent, as
towns which when they rebelled were recovered by means of their
citadels; I answer, that for the recovery of Tarentum, Fabius Maximus
was sent at the end of a year with an army strong enough to retake it
even had there been no fortress there; and that although he availed
himself of the fortress for the recovery of the town, he might, without
it, have resorted to other means which would have brought about the
same result. Nor do I see of what service a citadel can be said to be,
when to recover the city you must employ a consular army under a Fabius
Maximus. But that the Romans would, in any case, have recovered
Tarentum, is plain from what happened at Capua, where there was no
citadel, and which they retook, simply by the valour of their soldiers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account