Mr. Breckinridge had disputed the truth of the fact he (Mr. T.) had
stated relative to the imprisonment and sale into bondage for life, in
the city of Washington, of a black man, justly entitled to his
freedom. He (Mr. T.) trusted that in this matter also he should be
able most satisfactorily to establish his own veracity. The evidence
he would produce to support the statement he had made, was, "A
memorial of the inhabitants of the District of Columbia, U. S., signed
by one thousand of the most respectable citizens of the District, and
presented to Congress, March 24, 1828, then referred to the Committee
on the District, and on the motion of Mr. Hubbard, of New-Hampshire,
Feb. 9, 1835, ordered to be printed." He (Mr. T.) held in his hand the
genuine document printed by Congress, "22d Congress, 2d Session, House
of Representatives, Doc. No. 140." The following was the part
containing the fact he had mentioned.
"A colored man, who stated that he was entitled to freedom
was taken up as a runaway slave, and lodged in the jail of
Washington City. He was advertised, but no one appearing to
claim him, he was according to law, put up at public auction
for the payment of his jail fees, and SOLD as a SLAVE for
LIFE. He was purchased by a slave trader, who was not
required to give security for his remaining in the District
and he was soon shipped at Alexandria for one of the southern
States. An attempt was made by some benevolent individual to
have the sale postponed until his claim to freedom could be
investigated; but their efforts were unavailing; and thus was
a human being SOLD into PERPETUAL BONDAGE at the capital of
the freest government on earth, without even a pretence of
trial, or an allegation of crime."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account