Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparisonFox, Herbert
Science
Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparison
Fox, Herbert
Veterinary medicine
The majority of students to-day place responsibility for gastroenteritis
upon the bacteria known to be present in the various intestinal tracts,
mentioning especially colon and proteus groups, streptococci, the
necrosis bacillus and anaerobes of the Welch class. In a few of our
studies of intestinal bacteria in cases of enteritis one thing has been
very definite and that is that in the intestinal content of animals
whose food is largely meat, Gram-negative bacilli have predominated,
whereas in herbivorous animals Gram-positive organisms have been most
numerous. From the observations of Kitt, Strassberger and some others,
the normal flora of domesticated animals is subject to wide variations
so that our observations must receive confirmation before they are
finally acceptable. We have on several occasions isolated from
carnivorous intestines Bact. paracoli, Bact. suipestifer and other
members of this group. We have no reliable cultural data upon the
herbivorous intestine and can only quote the Gram pictures as mentioned
above. On two occasions, an eland and an elk, a very large number of
forms corresponding to necrosis bacillus were seen; to this organism
Kitt gives considerable power in the production of necrotizing
processes.
TABLE 11.
_This table shows an analysis of all cases of gastroenterocolitis. The
left half of the table is an analysis of orders upon which one hundred
or more autopsies have been done, the right half of orders with fewer
than that number. The left half is expressed in percentages, the right
half in number of cases only since percentages might be misleading. Left
hand table: First column is percentage of gastroenterocolitis per order;
next five columns the percentages in which each of the factors in the
headings was believed responsible; the last three columns show the
participation of each of the divisions of the intestinal tract; thus
Primates had all told 24.8 per cent. of inflammations of which 7.2 per
cent. were in stomach, 18.3 per cent. in the intestines and 8 per cent.
in the colon; obviously many had all three sections affected. Right hand
table is constructed on a similar basis except that number of cases is
quoted, not percentages, and the total is put in the last column._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account