Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparisonFox, Herbert
Science
Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparison
Fox, Herbert
Veterinary medicine
The avian alimentary tract seems to have developed according to the
character of food the different varieties of birds consume if one may
judge by the construction of the bill, the gastric musculature and the
intestinal wall. Zoological classification has only secondarily
considered this point, it being made incidental to the habits and
habitats of birds. For this reason the orders as outlined on pages
44–46, placed as they are in historical evolutionary position, represent
with few exceptions groups which have differing diets and, by the same
token, differing gastrointestinal tracts. Classifications based upon
habits of life (Raptores, Cantores, Natores), prove likewise too broad
or too heterogeneous, while systems making character of food the chief
criterion though apparently correct in reasoning and helpful in certain
orders, (Accipitres, Galli) are found to present copious exceptions;
moreover we are imperfectly informed of the exact diet that many
families require or resort to in absence of their preferred food. I
shall therefore discuss the chief diseases and distributions according
to our classification, preceding the discussion by a brief résumé of the
anatomical peculiarities of the avian alimentary tube.
The first digestive burden falls upon the proventricle where the
principal juices are secreted while the muscular stomach or gizzard
assumes the duty of gastric mastication. The lateral muscular bellies of
its heavy wall grind the food and mix well the gastric juices. Its
mucosa probably supplies only lubricant. In birds whose food is hard,
corn and the like, this grinder is supplied with a dry horny internal
layer, while a thick, moist, soft, epithelial surface is sufficient for
carnivorous birds. All kinds of gradations exist between these extremes.
The mucosa of the proventricle is always soft, but quite deep to permit
the placement of compound tubular glands.
The relation of size of these two parts is subject to many
variations.[22] The proventricle is larger proportionately in meat
eating, fish-eating and fruit eating birds, the gizzard having the
greater size in granivora and insectivora. In certain birds the mucosa
of the two is separated by a very soft thin zone, an important fact in
Psittaci since at this place spiroptera seem to penetrate to the
glandular layer of both organs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account