Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparisonFox, Herbert
Science
Disease in captive wild mammals and birds : $b incidence, description, comparison
Fox, Herbert
Veterinary medicine
It might be contended that observations upon diseased states in captive
animals would not represent natural developments, in other words, not
that which occurs in the wild. Such indeed may be true in regard to the
infectious diseases, but since we are imperfectly informed as to the
pathology of the wild state, we are obliged to accept and use the best
substitute at hand. Moreover it seems perfectly fair to consider as
characteristic for an animal or group, the physical and even
physiological expressions of morbid agencies as we know them, even
though the animals be at the time under conditions not natural to them.
It would be perhaps incorrect to say that cirrhosis of the liver occurs
in .6 per cent. of animals in the wild as is the case for our autopsies,
since incorrect food and infections are potent in its causation; on the
other hand, our experience and some few data from naturalists and
pathologists make it conceivable that tumors occur to this number in
native states. The incidence of tumors in wild rodents is quite well
known. Degenerations and fibroses, the result of parasitism, are known
to exist throughout the entire animal kingdom. Further to illustrate how
pathology is distributed in wild life, Plimmer’s experience[2] with 500
rats (_M. decumanus_) might be cited. He found the following: Tubercle 3
times, tape worm cysts 10, Tryp. lewisi 49, empyema 2, tumor of jaw from
old injury 1, pleuritis and hydrothorax 1. Bacteria were found in 71
rats, 40 times in the lungs, 31 times in the spleen; saccharomyces were
found 16 times in the lungs. Dr. W. L. Abbott reports to us personally
that he has repeatedly found coiled exproventricular worms in the wild
specimens he has collected. Not only are we informed of some isolated
and individual pathological states but the existence of epizoötics of
communicable disease among wild life is well authenticated. The simple
citation of the extermination of deer in one section of Colorado by
pleuropneumonia will suffice to illustrate this point. Other examples
are, however, interesting. The occurrence of changes in the jaw bone
almost certainly those of actinomycosis is reported by Blair, the
specimens being shot in the wild and believed never to have been near
civilization. The white-tailed deer of the Swan River Valley in Montana,
are known to be constant carriers of liver-flukes.
It would seem therefore that it is not unfair to use material gathered
from animals under somewhat unnatural conditions as representing the
reaction of the zoological orders to pathogenic agencies. Such
conclusions must however be made very guardedly, for it is probable that
not over ten per cent. of the total number of mammalian and avian
species are to be observed in captivity. Because of the number of orders
and the great variety of genera included in the present study it is
probable nevertheless that the lesions are fairly representative of the
whole animal kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account