Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in EuropeGrellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
History
Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in Europe
Grellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
Romanies
language is a mixture of corrupt words from the Wallachian, Sclavonian,
Hungarian, and other nations.” Among these, the best-founded notion may
be, that it is the dialect of some particular country, though no longer
so pure as in the country whence it originated. This opinion meets the
greatest concurrence of the learned: and will, we hope, be fully proved
in another part of this book, where the subject will be again discussed,
more fully, in order to corroborate the other proofs of the origin of
this people. It will then be certified, in what country this is the
native mother tongue. This is a point concerning which most writers
think differently. Sometimes the Gipseys are Hebrews, then Nubians,
Egyptians, Phrygians, Vandals, Sclavonians, or, as opinions vary, perhaps
some other nation.
It appears extraordinary, that the language of a people who have lived
for centuries among us, and has been matter of enquiry almost ever since,
should still remain an affair of so much uncertainty. Gipseys are to be
found every-where, and might be very easily examined, as closely and
often as any body pleased, about their language. It would have been
attended with no great trouble, to have made so near an acquaintance as
to bring them to converse with variety of people, and thereby, by means
of comparison, to have attained some degree of certainty. This
observation sounds plausibly; but on a closer examination the case is
found to be very different. First, it is not so easy as people may
imagine, to gain much information from the Gipseys concerning their
language. They are suspicious, apprehending an explanation might be
attended with danger to themselves; and are therefore not very
communicative. To this must be added, their natural levity, and
consequent seeming inattention to the questions put to them. A writer,
who had frequent experience of this behaviour, expresses himself to the
following effect: “Suppose any person had an inclination to learn the
Gipsey language, he would find it very difficult to accomplish his
purpose. Intercourse with these people is almost insufferable; and very
few of them have sense enough to teach any thing, or even to give a
proper answer to a question. If you ask about a single word, they
chatter a great many, which nobody can understand. Others have equally
failed of success, not being able, by any means whatever, to obtain from
them the paternoster in their own language.” Secondly, suppose the
language of the Gipseys had been perfectly understood soon after their
arrival in Europe, variety of opinions would nevertheless have been
maintained among the learned. It would still have been necessary, in
order to ascertain truth, to have revised the original languages of all
the inhabitants both in and out of Europe, or at least a general sketch
of them. By such a review, the Gipseys’ mother tongue might easily have
been discovered. But many there are, as Büttner, Schlözer, Gibelin, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account