Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in EuropeGrellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
History
Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in Europe
Grellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
Romanies
“Now it is known that the Egyptian priests had stated incomes, from
appropriated lands; which circumstance attached them to their native
country: and hence they hated an unsettled life. Neither did they
desire to make proselytes; and strangers, who wished to be initiated
into the rites and mysteries of Isis, were obliged to submit to be
circumcised;—this ceremony was indispensable: on the contrary, the
before-mentioned priests of Isis wandering about the Roman provinces,
never mentioned a word of circumcision to their new converts. Very
sensible critics have produced palpable evidence that they were
Ethiopians and Troglodytes, who could the more easily pass for
Egyptians, as their features, persons, customs, and religion, were
the same.
“Of all the writers who mention these emigrations, from Egypt, into
Italy, Greece, and every part of the globe which was known in the
time of the Romans, I shall refer only to Heliodorus. It was very
possible that, sometimes, real Egyptians who had been driven by
misfortunes from their native country, or perhaps some of the very
lowest rank of people who had nothing to lose, might be mixed with
these wanderers. From this mixture of Ethiopians, Troglodytes, and
Egyptians, then, sprang a distinct wandering race, which partakes, in
some measure, of all the three nations; and from which, according to
the foregoing observations, we may reasonably conclude the Gipseys of
our time to be descended; as in all of them we discover, sometimes
the Troglodyte, sometimes the Ethiopian, and sometimes the Egyptian.
“That no mention is made of them in the Hungarian yearly publications
before the year 1417, is by no means a proof that they were not known
long before, both in that kingdom and the Banat. If we admit the
Roman coins which are dug out of the earth as proof that the Romans
have been inhabitants of any place, without the concurrent testimony
of any historian; we are equally authorised to admit the little
Egyptian idols, of bronze, which are dug up near them in the Banat,
as proof for the Gipseys. Being dispersed all over the Roman
conquest, why might they not as well, when Dacia became a province,
have gone there likewise, and propagated the worship of Isis, Anubis,
and other Egyptian deities, the same as in Italy?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account