Upon the propriety of removing the exciting causes, and the manner of
doing so, very little requires to be said. If any acrid, or stimulating
substance, has been applied to the skin, or any extraneous body been
forced into it, these must be removed before the inflammation can
be resolved; because, if they be allowed to remain, they will keep
up the action so long, and to such a degree, that suppuration will
be produced, or gangrene, if the part be very sensible, (as, for
instance, the cutis) or if the exciting cause be very irritating.
Acrid substances are to be removed by ablution with water, which is
in general much better than the solutions which are proposed upon
the principle of chemically combining with the acrid; because these
generally are likewise acrid, or stimulating, and increase still more
the inflammation which has taken place, before they can combine with
the substance which was formerly applied, and become neutralised. This
may be illustrated by the operations of acids and alkalis. If heat
have been applied, so as to induce inflammation, we must remove the
superabundant quantity of heat, but must not apply cold; because we
then do mischief, as will be afterwards mentioned.
When a substance is forced into the skin, so as to stimulate
mechanically, we must endeavour to lay hold of it, and pull it out;
but if it have penetrated so deep as to make this impracticable, we
must then enlarge the wound, and remove it; because we thus may enable
the wound to heal by the first intention. If, however, the injury done
be great, if the part be much bruised, or the extraneous substances
be numerous, we may be less anxious about the extraction of such as
require much trouble; because the irritation which is thus given will
tend to increase the degree of inflammation, and, very probably, its
extent, at the same time, that, from the original injury, there is
little prospect of adhesion being procured, or suppuration prevented.
We are then chiefly to search after, and extract foreign bodies, when
we apprehend that their removal may permit the inflammation to be
resolved, and adhesion to take place, and when we expect that their
presence will excite a greater action than our endeavours to extract
them will do. This is a rule which ought to be carefully remembered by
every surgeon, and especially by those whose situation makes them be
daily called to take the management of gun-shot wounds. They are not
brought to their patient to show how much they can do in the way of
cutting and probing; it is their duty to administer relief, and act so
as to prevent and abate the inflammatory action, which they will often
do most effectually by letting their patient alone, and throwing aside
their ball-screws and forceps.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account