[183] The words _number_, _chamber_, and many others in English are from the French _nombre_, _chambre_, &c. Why was the spelling changed? or rather why is the spelling of _lustre_, _metre_, _theatre_, _not_ changed? The cases are precisely similar. The Englishman who first wrote _number_ for _nombre_, had no greater authority to make the change, than any modern writer has to spell _lustre_, _metre_ in a similar manner, _luster_, _meter_. The change in the first instance was a valuable one; it conformed the spelling to the pronunciation, and I have taken the liberty, in all my writings, to pursue the principle in _luster_, _meter_, _miser_, _theater_, _sepulcher_, &c. [184] The first by Sir Thomas Smith, secretary of state to Queen Elizabeth: Another by Dr. Gill, a celebrated master of St. Paul's school in London: Another by Mr. Charles Butler, who went so far as to print his book in his proposed orthography: Several in the time of Charles the first; and in the present age, Mr. Elphinstone has published a treatise in a very ridiculous orthography. [185] I once heard Dr. Franklin remark, "that those people spell best, who do not know how to spell;" that is, they spell as their ears dictate, without being guided by rules, and thus fall into a regular orthography. [186] In Chaucer's life, prefixed to the edition of his works 1602, I find _move_ and _prove_ spelt almost correctly, _moove_ and _proove_. [187] In the Roman language _liber_ had four or five different meanings; it signified _free_, _the inward bark of a tree_, _a book_, sometimes _an epistle_, and also _generous_. [188] Thus most people suppose the present mode of spelling to be really the _easiest_ and _best_. This opinion is derived from habit; the new mode of spelling proposed would save three fourths of the labor now bestowed in learning to write our language. A child would learn to spell as well in one year, as he can now in four. This is not a supposition--it is an assertion capable of proof; and yet people, never knowing, or having forgot the labor of learning, suppose the present mode to be the easiest. No person, but one who has taught children, has any idea of the difficulty of learning to spell and pronounce our language in its present form. [189] See his Miscellaneous Works, p. 470. Ed. Lond. 1779. [190] This indefatigable gentleman, amidst all his other employments, public and private, has compiled a Dictionary on his scheme of a Reform, and procured types to be cast for printing it. He thinks himself too old to pursue the plan; but has honored me with the offer of the manuscript and types, and expressed a strong desire that I should undertake the task. Whether this project, so deeply interesting to this country, will ever be effected; or whether it will be defeated by indolence and prejudice, remains for my countrymen to determine.