Distributive Justice: The Right and Wrong of Our Present Distribution of Wealth — John Shaqi
Distributive Justice: The Right and Wrong of Our Present Distribution of WealthRyan, John A. (John Augustine)
PhilosophyChristian
Distributive Justice: The Right and Wrong of Our Present Distribution of Wealth
Ryan, John A. (John Augustine)
Economic history; Income distribution -- Moral and ethical aspects; Wealth -- Religious aspects
WAGNER: Grundlegung der Nationaloekonomie. Leipzig;
1892-1894.
PESCH: Lehrbuch der Nationaloekonomie. Freiburg; 1905-1913.
ANTOINE: Cours d'Économie Sociale. Paris; 1899.
HITZE: Capital et Travail. Louvain; 1898.
HOLLANDER: The Abolition of Poverty. Houghton Mifflin
Company; 1914.
ELLWOOD: The Social Problem. Macmillan; 1915.
GARRIGUET: The Social Value of the Gospel. Herder; 1911.
PARKINSON: A Primer of Social Science. Devin-Adair Co.; 1913.
VERMEERSCH: Quaestiones de Justitia. Bruges; 1901.
KING: The Wealth and Income of the People of the United
States. Macmillan; 1915.
COMMISSION ON INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. Final Report; 1915.
SECTION I
THE MORALITY OF PRIVATE LANDOWNERSHIP AND RENT DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
CHAPTER I
THE LANDOWNER'S SHARE OF THE NATIONAL PRODUCT
That part of the national product which represents land, and is
attributed specifically to land, goes to the landowner. It is called
economic rent, or simply rent. We say that rent "is attributed
specifically to land," rather than "is produced specifically by land,"
because we do not know what proportion of the joint product of the
different factors of production exactly reflects the productive
contribution of any factor. Economic rent represents the productivity
of land in so far as it indicates what men are willing to pay for
land-use in the productive process. In any particular case rent comes
into existence because the land makes a commercially valuable
contribution to the product; and it goes to the landowner because this
is one of the powers or rights included in the institution of private
ownership. And the landowner's share is received by him precisely in
his capacity as landowner, and not because he may happen to be
labourer, farmer, or proprietor of agricultural capital.
It is perhaps superfluous to observe that not all land produces rent.
While almost all land is useful and productive, at least potentially,
there is in almost every locality some land which in present
conditions does not warrant men in paying a price for its use. If the
crop raised on very sandy soil is so small as to cover merely the
outlay for labour and capital, men will not pay rent for the use of
that soil. Yet the land has contributed something to the product.
Herein we have another indication that rent is not an adequate measure
of land productivity. It merely represents land value,--at a given
time, in given circumstances.
_Economic Rent Always Goes to the Landowner_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account