Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
Governor Harris had at the very beginning of his career allied himself
with the Democrats. As early as 1849, he had been elected to Congress,
where he became conspicuous for his advocacy of extreme State rights.
In 1857 he defeated Neil S. Brown for governor, and was re-elected in
1859. It was not difficult to predict what his action would be in the
crisis of 1860. Immediately after the election of President Lincoln,
he issued a call for an extra session of the Legislature. It convened
on the seventh day of January, and on the same day he sent in his
message. This message is worthy of study, as it has been pronounced by
a distinguished writer to be “the ablest and most succinct as well as
the most intelligent presentation and justification of the reasons for
the action of the seceding States.”[1] It began with the following
description of the crisis confronting the State: “The long,
systematic, and wanton agitation of the slavery question, with actual
and threatened aggressions of the Northern States and a portion of
their people upon the well-defined constitutional rights of the
Southern citizens, the rapid increase of a purely sectional party,
whose bond of union is uncompromising hostility to the rights and
institutions of the fifteen Southern States, have produced a condition
in the affairs of the country unparalleled in the history of the past,
resulting already in the withdrawal from the Confederacy of one of the
sovereignties which compose it, while others are rapidly preparing to
move in the same direction.”[2]
This opening statement was followed by an historical review in which
was traced the growth of the Republican party. The offences it had
committed against the Southern States were then enumerated. Among
other things, he said:
“It has sought to appropriate to itself, and to exclude the
slaveholders from, the territory acquired by the common
blood and treasure of all. It has, through the
instrumentality of the Emigrants’ Aid Society under State
patronage, flooded the territories with its minions armed
with Sharp’s rifles and bowie knives, seeking thus to
accomplish by intimidation, violence, and murder what it
could not do by constitutional means.
“It claimed the constitutional right to abolish slavery in
the District of Columbia, the forts, arsenals, dock-yards,
and other places ceded to the United States within the
bounds of the slaveholding States. It proposed a prohibition
of the slave-trade between the States, thereby crowding the
slaves together, and preventing the exit south until they
became unprofitable to such an extent that it would force
the owner finally to abandon them in self-defence. It has,
by the deliberate legislative enactments of a large majority
of the Northern States, openly and flagrantly nullified the
clause of the Constitution which provided for the return of
fugitive slaves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account