Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
“_Whereas_, The General Assembly has with pleasure received,
through the message of his Excellency the Governor, the
communications of certain gentlemen, holders of bonds of the
State, and representatives of holders of bonds, asking for a
conference looking to a permanent and equitable adjustment
and compromise of the claims held by them against the State;
therefore, be it
“_Resolved_, By the General Assembly, that the Governor be
requested to communicate by telegram, or by letter, with the
gentlemen holding securities of the State, mentioned in his
message, and request them to submit, on the earliest day
possible, through him, to the General Assembly any
proposition of adjustment and compromise, which they may
desire.”
As the result of this resolution, a committee of the Legislature and a
committee of the bondholders met and agreed to the following
proposition: “That arrearages of interest to July 1, 1877, be added to
the bonds, and that new ones for sixty per cent. of the total amount
be issued, made to bear interest at six per cent., and to fall due in
thirty years.” It was naturally expected that the Legislature would
ratify the action of its committee. Much to the surprise of every one
concerned, it not only rejected the proposition, but decreased the tax
rate from forty to ten cents per hundred dollars, and thus made the
payment of interest absolutely impossible.
Later in the year the bondholders presented a second proposition, in
which they agreed to a scaling of the debt fifty per cent., but this
was also rejected by the Legislature.
In 1879 a committee was appointed by both Houses of the Legislature to
investigate and report upon the State debt. This committee, after
taking a great amount of evidence, presented an elaborate report.
Acting upon this report the Legislature passed a second bill, March
31st. It provided for the issue of bonds bearing four per cent.
interest to be exchanged for outstanding bonds with the interest
accrued thereon, at the rate of fifty per cent. on the dollar. It was
not to become a law until approved by a vote of the people, and two
thirds of the bondholders. The consent of the bondholders was readily
obtained, but the measure was defeated at the polls.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account