Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
3. Provide for the protection of the owner in the peaceable possession
of his slave while in transition or temporarily sojourning in any of
the States of the Confederacy, and, in the event of the slave’s
escaping or being taken from the owner, require the State to return,
or account for, him as in the case of a fugitive.
4. Especially prohibit Congress from abolishing slavery in the
District of Columbia, in any dock-yard, navy-yard, arsenal, or any
district of any character whatever, within the limits of any slave
State.
5. Provide that these amendments shall never be changed except by
consent of all the slave States.
With these amendments to the Constitution, Governor Harris said that
he could feel that the rights of the Southern States were reasonably
secure, not only in theory, but in fact, and should indulge the hope
of living in the Union in peace. “If the non-slaveholding States
refuse to comply with a demand so just and reasonable; refuse to
abandon at once and forever their unjust war upon us, our
institutions, and our rights; refuse, as they have heretofore done to
perform, in good faith, the obligations of the compact of the Union,
much as we appreciate the power, prosperity, and glory of this
government, deeply as we deplore the existence of the causes which
have already driven one State out of the Union, much as we regret the
imperative necessity which they have wantonly and wickedly forced upon
us, every consideration of self-preservation and self-respect requires
that we should assert and maintain our equality in the Union, or our
independence out of it.”
The message closed with the following recommendation to the
Legislature: “I recommend that you provide by law for submitting to
the people of the State the question of Convention or No Convention;
and also the election of delegates by the people to meet in State
Convention at the Capitol at Nashville, at the earliest day
practicable, to take into consideration our federal relations, and
determine what action shall be taken by the State of Tennessee for the
security of the rights and the peace of her citizens. This will place
the whole matter in the hands of the people, for them, in their
sovereignty, to determine how far their rights have been violated, the
character of the redress or guaranty they will demand, or the action
they will take for their present and future security.”
The Legislature proceeded without delay to put into effect the
recommendations contained in Governor Harris’s message. On January
19th it passed an act known as the Convention Bill,[3] which provided
for submitting the question of holding a convention to the vote of the
people. The convention was to take into consideration the relation
between the government of the United States and the people of the
State, and was to have the power to adopt any measures for vindicating
the sovereignty of the State and the people it saw fit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account