Diversions of a NaturalistLankester, E. Ray (Edwin Ray), Sir
History
Diversions of a Naturalist
Lankester, E. Ray (Edwin Ray), Sir
Natural history
In May, 1900, I was, with the late Sir Clement Hill, appointed
"plenipotentiary" by her Majesty Queen Victoria to meet representatives
of Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, and the Congo States in a
conference, presided over by the late Marquis of Linlithgow, at the
Foreign Office. The conference was arranged by the great African
powers in order to consider and report on the means to be taken to
preserve the big game animals of Africa from extinction. We spent an
extremely interesting fortnight, and finally agreed upon a report, the
upshot of which was that whilst certain animals, such as the giraffe,
some zebras and antelopes, the gorilla, and such useful birds as the
vultures, secretary bird, owls, and the cow-pickers (Buphagus), should
be absolutely protected, others should be only protected at certain
seasons, or in youth, or in limited numbers, and others again should
be killed without licence or restraint at any time, such being the
lion, the leopard, the hunting-dog, destructive baboons, most birds
of prey, crocodiles, pythons, and poisonous snakes. The question of
large "nature-reserves" was discussed. It was agreed that such reserves
should be maintained for the breeding-places and rearing of the young
of desirable animals, and that the destruction of predatory animals or
an excess of other forms should be permitted to the administrators of
such reserves. Thus it is clear that no absolute "nature-reserves" were
considered possible.
In fact this is the case whether the reserve be large or small. Once
man is present in the neighbourhood, even at a long distance, he upsets
the "balance of Nature." The naturalist's small "nature-reserve" may be
ravaged by predatory animals driven from the outlying region occupied
by man, or again, the absence from the "reserve" of predatory animals
which act as natural checks on the increase of other animals, may lead
to excessive and unhealthy multiplication of the latter. Man must
"weed" and artificially manage his "reserve" after all! Man brings
also into the neighbourhood of reserves, great and small, disease
germs in his domesticated animals, which are carried by insects into
the cherished "reserve," and there cause destruction. Conversely,
the animals maintained in a reserve carry in their blood microscopic
parasites to the poisons of which they have become immune by natural
selection in the course of ages. They act as "reservoirs" of such
microscopic germs. These germs carried by flies or other insects to the
carefully reared cattle imported by civilized man from other regions
of the world into the neighbourhood of such "reserves," cause deadly
disease (such as the tsetse-fly diseases or trypanosome diseases)
to those imported cattle, as also to man himself. Whilst, then, we
may do something to retain small tracts of our own country in the
modified state which it attained after the earlier inhabitants had
destroyed lion, bear, wolf, and other noxious animals, as well as great
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account