Divine Authority; Or, the Question: Was Joseph Smith Sent of God?Pratt, Orson
Religion
Divine Authority; Or, the Question: Was Joseph Smith Sent of God?
Pratt, Orson
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -- Doctrines; Smith, Joseph, Jr., 1805-1844
Eleventh.--The miracles wrought by Joseph Smith are evidences of no
small moment to establish his divine authority. In the name of the
Lord he cast out devils, healed the sick, spoke with new tongues,
interpreted ancient languages, and predicted future events. Many
of these miracles were wrought before numerous multitudes of both
believers and unbelievers, and upon persons not connected with
our church. And again, the numerous miracles wrought through the
instrumentality of thousands of the officers and members of this
church, are additional evidences that the man who was instrumental in
founding the church _must have been sent of God_. The thousands of sick
that have been miraculously healed in all parts of the world where
this gospel is preached, give forth a strong and almost irresistible
testimony that Mr. Smith's authority is "_from heaven_." Although the
great majority of mankind consider miracles to be an _infallible_
evidence in favor of the divine authority of the one who performs
them, yet we do most distinctly dissent from this idea. If miracles be
admitted as an _infallible_ evidence, then all that have ever wrought
miracles must have been sent of God. The magicians of Egypt wrought
some splendid miracles before that nation; they created serpents and
frogs, and turned rivers of water into blood. If miraculous evidence
is _infallible_, the Egyptians were bound to receive the contradictory
messages of both Moses and the magicians as of divine authority.
According to this idea, the witch of Endor must have established her
divine mission beyond all controversy by calling forth a dead man from
the grave in the presence of Saul, king of Israel. A certain wicked
power described by John (Rev. viii chap.) was to do "great _wonders_"
and "_miracles_," and cause "_fire to come down from heaven on the
earth in the sight of men_." If miracles were infallible evidences,
surely no one should reject the divine authority of John's beast. Again
(in Rev. chapter xvi) John "_saw three unclean spirits like frogs_,"
which he expressly says, "_are the_ SPIRITS OF DEVILS WORKING MIRACLES,
_which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world to
gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty_." The
learned divines and clergy of the nineteenth century boldly declare
that "_miracles are an_ INFALLIBLE _evidence of the divine mission
of the one who performs them_." If so, who can blame "_the kings of
the earth_," and these learned divines, and all their followers for
embracing the message of these divinely inspired devils? For according
to their argument, they should in no wise reject them, for they
prove their mission by evidences which they say are infallible. We
shall expect in a few years, to see an innumerable host of sectarian
ministers as well as kings, taking up their line of march for the
great valley of "Armageddon," near Jerusalem, and thus prove by their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account