Divine Authority; Or, the Question: Was Joseph Smith Sent of God?Pratt, Orson
Religion
Divine Authority; Or, the Question: Was Joseph Smith Sent of God?
Pratt, Orson
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -- Doctrines; Smith, Joseph, Jr., 1805-1844
My dear sir, the "Saints" have made out a strong and irrefragable case
to show that "_authority to teach_" is no where, if not with them;
but the proposition that _they have authority to teach, interpret
&c._, is one that at present does not create a conviction in Mr. --
or my mind. We admit that it is very reasonable to suppose that,
under such circumstances, God would raise up and send _one invested
with authority_. Whether Joseph Smith was such an one is the all
important question. I also admit, that so far as I am acquainted with
his history, there is something very remarkable about him; perhaps
I should be fully convinced if I were more fully read in writings
relating to him. I wish I lived near to you, and then I would read
more fully on the subject I confess my mind is much concerned to
arrive at a clear conclusion upon the point.
Mr. -- wishes you, if you will be so good, to select a few books that
you think clearly prove the divine mission of Joseph Smith, and send
them in a parcel to him with the prices; he will feel much obliged,
and will send you a post-office order for the amount; he believes
your selection will be a judicious one. I have heard Mr. Banks twice
since I saw you, and other individual teachers also. There is much in
their public services I approve. I am struck with the simplicity of
their celebration of the ordinances. Mr. Banks and the others _assert
strongly_ the divinity of Joseph Smith's mission; this is, however,
not enough: the church of the early saints had proofs to give by
inspired apostles like Peter, inspired deacons like Stephen, inspired
evangelists like Philip, inspired prophets like Agabus, and inspired
prophetesses like Philip's daughters. All this was the result of the
_Spirit_ being in and with them _in authority and power_. The church
of the latter day ought to be the same, if having the _same spirit of
authority and power_. The sects are without these proofs, therefore
they are sects groping in the dark, and hoping, and thinking, and
guessing they are right, and all this convinces that they are not
"the Church, the body of Christ;" bodies they are of their doctors
and founders sure enough! Now I think the Church of the Latter-day
Saints must resemble the original, or it is at once proved only a
sect. One result of my conversation with you and Banks, and perusing
the Letters, is, that I can be no longer connected with any sect. So
far as I see, I can without difficulty confound in argument--plain
scriptural argument--any into whose company I am at any time thrown.
The Methodist _system_ I am convinced is the worst, because its
pretensions are highest. I stand, therefore, fully alone. I declare
I should be glad to be convinced that Mormonism is what it professes
to be; I would join it to-day if my mind could be convinced that its
elders had _authority to baptize me for the remission of sins, and lay
hands on me for the gift of the Holy Ghost_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account