Doctor and patient : $b Papers on the relationship of the physician to men and institutions — John Shaqi
Doctor and patient : $b Papers on the relationship of the physician to men and institutionsPeabody, Francis Weld
Science
Doctor and patient : $b Papers on the relationship of the physician to men and institutions
Peabody, Francis Weld
Medicine; Medicine -- Practice; Physicians
The layman of the older generation, who has been disappointed in his
medical experience and who feels that something has been lacking in
the way of warmth, sympathy and understanding of his case as a whole,
is very apt to hark back to earlier days. “What we need,” he says, “is
a general practitioner! When I was a boy we went to see Dr. Brown if
we had anything the matter with us and he always fixed us up. Nowadays
there don’t seem to be any general practitioners, and we visit one
specialist after another, trying to find the one who happens to know
about our particular ailment.” Does this complaint merely represent
the normal senescent yearning for those old times which always seem
to have been so much better than anything that has come since, or
does it rest upon some firmer basis and suggest a possible way out
of our present difficulty? At any rate, the question raised is worth
serious consideration. Why is it that the general practitioner is being
supplemented by the specialist, and where does the responsibility for
this shift in emphasis lie? Is the further development of this trend
to be regarded as desirable, either from the point of view of the
public or the medical profession, and if not what can be done about it?
The fundamental factor in the present increase in specialism is without
doubt the progress which has been made during the last two or three
decades in the various sciences which underlie the art of medical
practice. Researches in anatomy, embryology, physiology, physics,
chemistry, pathology, and bacteriology have so extended our knowledge
of disease processes in man that, in spite of a lengthening of the
period of study, it has become quite impossible for any individual to
acquire an intimate understanding of all the broad fields of modern
medicine. In the four years’ course of the medical school the student
can get little more than an introduction into the so-called premedical
sciences, and he learns of them only what is necessary to enable him
to grasp the basic facts on which medical practice rests. If he is
fortunate enough to be able to pursue his studies for a period of years
after graduation, he naturally devotes himself to some limited phase
of medicine in which he is particularly interested, and attempts to
develop himself as far as possible in this direction. Meanwhile it is
quite impracticable for him to keep in touch with the details of other
fields and he becomes, by force of circumstances if not by wish, a
specialist in what is often a comparatively narrow sphere.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account