Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing. — John Shaqi
Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
History
Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
Communicable diseases -- Early works to 1800; Mead, Richard, 1673-1754. Short discourse concerning pestilential contagion; Plague -- Early works to 1800
Leaving then Doctor _Mead_ and his _Contagion_ under the Restraint of a
very good Argument, we will consider in the next Place, after what
manner he conveys it to a sound Person, and he _supposes_ the way to be
commonly this: _These contagious Particles—taint the salival Juices_ (or
Spittle) which being _swallowed down into the Stomach, presently fix
their Malignity there_; as appears from _the Nausea and Vomiting, with
which this Distemper often begins its first Attacks_. But all this is
acknowledged to be a Supposition, and not of sufficient Strength to bear
so weighty a Building upon it. _Secondly_, If a Man does nor swallow his
Spittle, or if he gargles his Throat very well before he does swallow
it, there would be no danger from the _Pestilence_; but this slye Plague
should be easily evaded. To what Purpose is this silly Supposition to
bring it into the Stomach, and then to suppose it _fixes its Malignity
there_, because People are often troubled with Vomiting when they are
ill of the Plague. An admirable Way of Reasoning: and as Admiration
begat Philosophy, so Dr. _Mead_’s Philosophy cannot fail of begetting
Admiration: For if the Stomach must needs be the first Place affected by
the Plague, and the Doctor is gone over to _Van Helmont_, cannot he
convey it thither down by the Nose, or even through the Mouth, without
infecting the Spittle.
Dr. _Mead_ is grosly out in his Observation, for the Symptoms of the
_Heart_, our _Strength_ at least, being affected, are previous to his
supposed _Nausea_ and Vomiting; so that he not only ought _to make no
Question_, but to be sure that the _Blood is also more immediately
affected_; as the Multitude of Physicians besides _Van Helmont_ and him
have always believed: But I find his Fancy lies much in odd Conceits. I
know a very honest Man, and a good Observer in Physick, who has fallen
into this very Error in explaining this Symptom of _Vomiting_; but every
Body will acknowledge that his Philosophy is no where the best: And when
this Symptom is truly explained, we shall find that it is a Symptom of a
_Malignant Fever_, as well as of the Plague, without any manner of
Irritation, or of any other Hurt of that Nature, in the Stomach. And
therefore as this Way of conveying the Plague, is a Supposition grounded
upon no manner of Observation (as the Doctor argues in this Paragraph)
so I think there is no need to have recourse to it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account