Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
History
Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
Communicable diseases -- Early works to 1800; Mead, Richard, 1673-1754. Short discourse concerning pestilential contagion; Plague -- Early works to 1800
The first Thing we are presented with, is a heavy Charge against the
Winds, for not doing their Duty; but that _Æolus_ himself is an _Aider_
and _Abettor_ of Plagues, by not sending his Winds Abroad, and thereby
stagnating the Air; for we are taught in this curious Discourse,
[10]_That the Use of Winds is to purify the Air by their Motion_. But
this Charge is altogether false, and ill grounded, because, Wind in
_England_ is put to many Uses; it not only blows cold, but it blows hot;
it fans our Ladies, and our Corn too; it dries Linnen, and sails our
Ships, _&c._ Besides, this Charge is absolutely false, for the Physician
that has left an Account of the Winds Behaviour in 1665[11], tells us,
That it was very dutiful, and, that the whole Summer was refreshed with
moderate Breezes, sufficient to prevent the Air’s _Stagnation_ and
_Corruption_, and to carry off the _pestilential Steams_: The Heat was
likewise too mild to encourage such _Corruption_ and _Fermentation_ as
helps to taint the animal Fluids. And therefore howsoever fond Dr.
_Mead_ is of Stagnation, through any failure of the Winds, it is certain
that they were then very blameless, let the Doctor find his Stagnation
where he can. Moreover, the Physicians were not of Opinion, at that
Time[12], that the _Air_ was _infected_, and therefore Doctor _Hodges_
tells us, That they were against making Fires, for the Reason of this
Purity of Air; and, that Fires are only proper when it is _impure_ and
_corrupted_. After this Account of Things, who will question Dr.
_Mead_’s great _Acuteness_ and _Accuracy_ in making Observations; or,
whether am not I more to be blamed for observing those Trifles of the
Doctor? Yet I cannot avoid making one short Observation more, which may
proceed from the small Regard the Doctor has to Memory; for at two Pages
off he assures us, _That our Air is not disposed to receive such_
(contagious) _Impressions_; then what need we mind the Stagnation of the
Air? Is there a Man in _England_, that will not forgive him this
Contradiction, if he will make the last part of it good?
[Footnote 10: Page 4.]
[Footnote 11: Page 18.]
[Footnote 12: Page 19.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account