Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
If Protestantism made its easy capitulation before the larger social
groups of mankind and its premature peace with them, it developed
its most stubborn resistance to the natural appetites of men in
its influence upon the individual life. It was precisely in that
area of life in which the medieval church was least effective that
Protestantism displayed its highest ambition. At this point it becomes
impossible to speak in general terms of Protestantism, for the
strategies of Calvinism and Lutheranism in dealing with the problems
of the inner life differ widely, even more widely than their social
policies. The unique characteristics of either are frequently the
common characteristics of Protestantism when viewed from some external
perspective; but an intimate view may reveal them in the light of very
different religions. Calvinism is religion’s most energetic effort to
master the ethical life of the individual. In some of its historic
forms, in Geneva and Scotland and the American colonies for instance,
its social policy was ambitious enough to compare with that of Pope
Gregory, but its chief interest was not in the social institution as
such. It merely used the political power to reinforce an uncompromising
ethical rigor in the life of the individual. In Calvinism the religion
of the modern world makes its boldest bid for the ethical mastery of
life. Calvinism believed that life could be dominated by the spiritual
and ethical ideal if the individual could be persuaded to control
his appetites and to overcome his natural indolence. A temperate,
industrious, thrifty and honest individual was, in its esteem, the
perfect exemplar of the religious ideal and the stuff out of which a
new society could be built. It never faced the problem of the conflict
between the ideal in the soul of the individual and the intractable
forces in human society because its moral ideals were socially and
economically very useful and it could therefore indulge the illusion
that economic success, social well-being and obvious happiness are
the natural and inevitable fruits of the religious life. Hence it was
a religion admirably suited for the middle classes who rose to power
in the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth century, for it endowed
them with virtues which would insure their success and it doubled their
zeal by giving religious sanction to their secular enterprises. The
ancient and medieval world had given moral precedence to a life of
leisure and meditation, whether of aristocrat or philosopher, of monk
or priest. Calvinism was as contemptuous of luxury and leisure as of
the arts and amenities which flourished in them. Its sanctification
of the common task, of manual toil and of commercial enterprise was
in itself a valuable contribution to social progress. It was in a way
the spiritual foundation upon which the whole structure of modern
civilization has been built. It developed a high type of honesty
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account