Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
appreciated and their high type of moral idealism could not serve
to qualify the less heroic morality of the law and the superficial
moralizing of the Wisdom literature. Incidentally it may be observed
that bibliolatry is one of the handicaps to moral progress in almost
all religions. Through it primitive cultures and moral customs which
happen to be enshrined in the canon become absolutely authoritative,
and the weight of their influence is set against new ventures in moral
life.
If Calvinistic and puritan idealism departed from its assumed norm in
its very conception, the moral realities which issued from it bore even
less resemblance to the absolute idealism of the ethics of Jesus. Its
unqualified confidence in the power of individual virtue to overcome
the world and change society contributed to the relaxation of moral
restraints upon social institutions and the secularization of society
to which reference has been made. Its sanctification of secular tasks
led inevitably to a sanctification of secular motives which it did not
desire but could not prevent. Men were to serve God by diligence in
their daily toil. But what was the end of industry which endowed it
with virtue? The puritan answer was to regard work as an end in itself,
an emphasis which it learned to make in its reaction to monastic
and aristocratic idleness. But that answer alone could not suffice.
Inevitably the material gains which were the rewards of industry were
given a special religious sanction. “If God show you a way in which
you may lawfully get more than in another way, without wrong to your
soul or to any other, if you refuse this and choose the less gainful,
you cross one of the ends of your Calling and refuse to be God’s
steward,” said Governor Bradford.[8] The ancient and medieval world
had been more or less scornful of the pursuit of wealth and abounded
in characters among both the nobility and the peasantry who thought
it beneath their dignity to increase their patrimony. The religious
sanction of material gain was a new thing in history and undoubtedly
helped to fashion the moral temper of modern society in which diligence
is the great virtue and greed the besetting vice.[9] It is the puritan
heritage of America which gives a clew to the paradox of our national
life. It explains how we can be at the same time the most religious and
the most materialistic of all modern nations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account