Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
The most marked and hated instrument of King James was [Sidenote: 1689.]
certainly the Chancellor Earl of Perth. He had taken an early
opportunity of trying to escape from the country, so soon as he learned
that the king himself had fled. It would have been better for all
parties if his lordship had succeeded in getting away; but some
officious Kirkcaldy boatmen had pursued his vessel, and brought him
back; and after he had undergone many contumelies, the government
consigned him to close imprisonment in Stirling Castle, ‘without the use
of pen, ink, or paper,’ and with only one servant, who was to remain
close prisoner with him. Another high officer of the late government,
John Paterson, Archbishop of Glasgow, was placed in close prison in
Edinburgh Castle, and not till after many months, allowed even to
converse with his friends: nor does he appear to have been released till
January 1693.
Among the multitude of the incarcerated was an ingenious foreigner, who
for some years had been endeavouring to carve a subsistence out of
Scotland, with more or less success. We have heard of Peter Bruce
before[11] as constructing a harbour, as patentee for a home-manufacture
of playing-cards, and as the conductor of the king’s Catholic
printing-house at Holyrood. It ought likewise to have been noted as a
favourable fact in his history, that the first system of water-supply
for Edinburgh—by a three-inch pipe from the lands of Comiston—was
effected by this clever Flandrian. At the upbreak of the old government
in December, Bruce’s printing-office was destroyed by the mob, and his
person laid hold of. We now (June 1689) learn, by a petition from him to
the Privy Council, that he had been enduring ‘with great patience and
silence seven months’ imprisonment, for no other cause or crime but the
coming of one Nicolas Droomer, skipper at Newport, to the petitioner’s
house, which Droomer was likewise on misinformation imprisoned in this
place, but is released therefra four weeks ago,’ He adds that he looks
on his imprisonment to be ‘but ane evil recompense for all the good
offices of his art, has been performed by him not only within the town
of Edinburgh, but in several places of the kingdom, to which he was
invited from Flanders. He, being a stranger, yet can make it appear [he]
has lost by the rabble upwards of twenty thousand merks of writs and
papers, besides the destruction done to his house and family, all being
robbed, pillaged, and plundered from him, and not so much as a shirt
left him or his wife.’ He [Sidenote: 1689.] thinks ‘such barbarous usage
has scarce been heard [of]; whereby, and through his imprisonment, he is
so out of credit, that himself was like to starve in prison, [and] his
family at home in the same condition.’ Peter’s petition for his freedom
was acceded to, on his granting security to the extent of fifty pounds
for peaceable behaviour under the present government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account