Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745 — John Shaqi
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
Robert Wilson, son of Andrew Wilson in Kelso, was servant to Mrs
Clerkson, a widow, at Damhead (near Edinburgh?). On finding that his
mistress was about to take a second husband, he raised a scandal against
her, in which his own moral character was concerned, and she immediately
appealed for redress to Master David Williamson, minister of St
Cuthbert’s parish. Two elders came to inquire into the matter—Wilson
evaded them, and could not be found. Then she applied for, and obtained
a warrant from a justice of peace to apprehend Wilson, who now took to
hiding. Four friends of hers, James Bruntain, farmer at Craig Lockhart;
David Rainie, brewer in Portsburgh; James Porteous, gardener at
Saughton; and James Borthwick, weaver at Burrowmuirhead, accompanied by
George Macfarlane, one of the town-officers of Edinburgh, came in search
of Wilson, and finding him sleeping in the house of William Bell, smith
in Merchiston, dragged him from bed, and in no gentle manner hurried him
off to Macfarlane’s house, where they kept him _tanquam in privato
carcere_ for twenty-four hours. On his pleading for permission to go to
the door for but a minute, swords were drawn, and he was threatened with
instant death, if he offered to stir. Professedly, they were to take him
before the justices; but a better conclusion to the adventure occurred
to them. Captain Hepburn, an officer [Sidenote: 1691.] about to sail
with his corps to Holland, was introduced to the terror-stricken lad,
who readily agreed to enlist with him, and accepted a dollar as earnest.
Before he quitted the care of his captors, he signed a paper owning the
guilt of raising scandal against his late mistress.
The father of the young man complained before the Privy Council of the
outrage committed on his son, as an open and manifest riot and
oppression, for which a severe punishment ought to be inflicted. He
himself had been ‘bereaved of a son whom he looked upon to be a comfort,
support, and relief to him in his old age.’ On the other hand, the
persons complained of justified their acts as legal and warrantable. The
Lords decided that Robert Wilson had ‘unjustly been kept under
restraint, and violence done to him;’ but the reparation they allowed
was very miserable—a hundred merks to the aggrieved father.[53]
[Sidenote: JAN. 29.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account