Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
The three Frenchmen concerned in this affair were Protestant refugees,
serving in the king’s Scottish guards. The Master of Tarbat in due time
succeeded his father as Earl of Cromarty, and survived the slaughter of
Poiret forty years. He was the father of the third and last Earl of
Cromarty, so nearly brought to Tower-hill in 1746, for his concern in
the rebellion of the preceding year, and who on that account lost the
family titles and estates.
[Sidenote: APR.]
Down to this time, it was still customary for gentlemen to go armed with
walking-swords. On the borders of the Highlands, dirks and pistols seem
to have not unfrequently been added. Accordingly, when a quarrel
happened, bloodshed was very likely to take place. At this time we have
the particulars of such a quarrel, serving to mark strongly the
improvements effected by modern civilisation.
Some time in August 1690, a young man named William Edmondstone,
described as apprentice to Charles Row, writer to the Signet, having
occasion to travel to Alloa, called on his master’s brother, William Row
of Inverallan in passing, and had an interview [Sidenote: 1691.] with
him at a public-house in the hamlet of Bridge of Allan. According to a
statement from him, not proved, but which it is almost necessary to
believe in order to account for subsequent events, Inverallan treated
him kindly to his face, but broke out upon him afterwards to a friend,
using the words rascal and knave, and other offensive expressions. The
same unproved statement goes on to relate how Edmondstone and two
friends of his, named Stewart and Mitchell, went afterwards to inquire
into Inverallan’s reasons for such conduct, and were violently attacked
by him with a sword, and two of them wounded.
The proved counter-statement of Inverallan is to the effect that
Edmondstone, Stewart, and Mitchell tried, on the 21st of April 1691, to
waylay him, with murderous intent, as he was passing between Dumblane
and his lands near Stirling. Having by chance evaded them, he was in a
public-house at the Bridge of Allan, when his three enemies unexpectedly
came in, armed as they were with swords, dirks, and pistols, and began
to use despiteful expressions towards him. ‘He being all alone, and
having no arms but his ordinary walking-sword, did rise up in a
peaceable manner, of design to have retired and gone home to his own
house.’ As he was going out at the door, William Edmondstone insolently
called to him to come and fight him, a challenge which he disregarded.
They then followed him out, and commenced an assault upon him with their
swords, Mitchell, moreover, snapping a pistol at him, and afterwards
beating him over the head with the but-end. He was barely able to
protect his life with his sword, till some women came, and drew away the
assailants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account