Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745 — John Shaqi
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic annals of Scotland : $b from the revolution to the rebellion of 1745
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 1689-1745
The pontiff was then arraigned before the judges as guilty of high
treason against Omnipotence, in as far as he had usurped many of its
privileges, besides advancing many blasphemous doctrines. ‘The court
adduced sufficient proofs by the canons of the church, bulls, pardons,
and indulgences, lying in process;’ and he was therefore pronounced
guilty, and ordered to be immediately taken to the public place of
execution, and burned to ashes, his blood to be attainted, and his
honours to be blotted out of all records. The procession was then formed
once more, and the sentence was read from the cross; after which ‘his
holiness was taken away from the theatre, and the sentence put in
execution against him. During the time of his burning, the spectators
were entertained with fireworks and some other divertisements.
‘After all was ended, the Trinity Church bell—which was the only church
in Scotland taken from the Protestants and given to the papists, wherein
they actually had their service—was rung all the night.’[3]
[Sidenote: MAR. 14.]
Patrick Walker relates,[4] with great relish, the close of the political
existence of the unhappy episcopate of Scotland, amidst the tumults
attending the sitting of the Convention at Edinburgh, during the process
of settling the crown on William and Mary. For a day or two after this
representative body sat down, several bishops attended, as a part of the
parliamentary constitution of the country, and by turns took the duty of
saying prayers. The last who did so, the Bishop of Dunkeld, spoke
pathetically of the [Sidenote: 1689.] exiled king as the man for whom
they had often watered their couches, and thus provoked from the
impetuous Montgomery of Skelmorley a jest at their expense which will
not bear repetition. They were ‘put out with disdain and contempt,’
while some of the members expressed a wish that the ‘honest lads’ knew
of it, ‘for then they would not win away with hale gowns.’ And so
Patrick goes on with the triumph of a vulgar mind, describing how they
‘gathered together with pale faces, and stood in a cloud in the
Parliament Close. James Wilson, Robert Neilson, Francis Hislop, and
myself were standing close by them. Francis Hislop with force thrust
Robert Neilson upon them; their heads went hard upon one another. But
there being so many enemies in the city, fretting and gnashing their
teeth, waiting for an occasion to raise a mob, where undoubtedly blood
would have been shed; and we having laid down conclusions among
ourselves to guard against giving the least occasion to all mobs; kept
us from tearing off their gowns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account