Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
‘... the other conceit had almaist have made a worse end; because
it was sae prejudicial to the commonwealth and estate of the haill
merchants and craftsmen, to wit, the abolition of the Monday’s mercat,
whilk was the only special mercat-day of all the week in respect of the
rest. The reason that the ministers had for them was, that all men that
came to the Monday’s mercat did address him to his journey on Sunday,
whilk day sould be sanctified and keepit holy; but amang many great
infallible reasons, it was funden that the maist part of the mercat
folks did never address themselves to journey while Monday morning, and
therefore the mercat should not cease; and as to these that came far
off, it became the pastors of their parochin to hinder them. Besides
all this, that mercat-day was authorised to the town by the princes
of ancient time, and therefore it became not a subject to consent to
the abolition thereof, unless the matter was moved in presence of
the three estates of parliament.’--_H. K. J._ The people in general
murmured at these interferences with their secular affairs, well meant
as they undoubtedly were. Calderwood speaks bitterly of the satirical
rhymes vented on the occasion against the clergy, adding: ‘Such has
always been the religion of Edinburgh, when they are touched in their
particular.’ At length, in April 1593, the affair of the market came
to a head. ‘The shoemakers, who were most interested in that business,
hearing that the same was to be put in execution, tumultuously
gathering themselves together, came to the ministers’ houses, menacing
to chase them furth of the town if they did urge that matter any more.
After which the motion ceased, the market continuing as before. This
did minister great occasions of sport at that time in court, where it
was said, “that rascals and souters could obtain at the ministers’
hands what the king could not in matters more reasonable.”’--_Spot._
* * * * *
[Sidenote: NOV. 17.]
‘Dame Margaret Douglas, sometime Countess of Bothwell, met the king
at the Castle-yett of Edinburgh on her knees, having up her hood,
crying for Christ’s sake that died on the cross, for mercy to her and
her spouse, with mony tears piteous to behold. The king putting out
his hand to have tane her up, she kissed the back of his hand thrice.
Then he passed into the castle, and the lady came down the street. The
same day, ere the king came out of the palace, the Lairds of Niddry
and Samuelston, with sundry others forfaultit of before, came on
their knees in the outward close of the palace, wha were received in
favours.’--_Jo. Hist._
[Sidenote: NOV. 23.]
‘Ane proclamation that no man shall receipt the Countess of Bothwell,
give her entertainment, or have any commerce or society with her in any
case, wha had been so lately received in his majesty’s favour before.
Behold the changes of court!‘--_Bir._
* * * * *
[Sidenote: DEC. 25.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account