Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
The disposition to violent and lawless acts at this time is strikingly
shewn in the proceedings against Claud and Alexander, two sons of James
Hamilton of Livingstone, in Linlithgowshire. Having some ground of
offence against David Dundas of Priestinch, they had gone at mid-day
with an armed party to his fold, and, there barbarously mutilated and
slaughtered a number of his cattle. They and their elder brother,
Patrick, also destroyed a mill leased by the same person, and further
set fire to his barn-yard at Duddington. Two months afterwards, when
John Yellowlees, a messenger, went with two assistants to the Peel of
Livingstone, to deliver letters of citation against these young men,
the laird, with his wife and four sons, came forth to the gate, and
taking him first by the throat, proceeded to beat him unmercifully, and
then, with a bended pistol at his breast, and many violent threats,
forced him to eat and swallow his four letters, and to promise never
to attempt to bring any such documents against them in future; besides
which, they struck the two witnesses with swords and pistols, and left
them for dead. The family were denounced as rebels.--_Pit._
[Sidenote: 1594-5.
JAN. 19.]
A great _tulyie_ or street-combat this day took place in Edinburgh.
[Sidenote: 1594-5.]
The Earl of Montrose, head of the house of Graham, was of grave
years--towards fifty: he was of such a character as to be chosen, a few
years afterwards, as chancellor of the kingdom: still later, he became
for a time viceroy of Scotland, the king being then in England. Yet
this astute noble was so entirely under the sway of the feelings of
the age, as to deem it necessary and proper that he should revenge the
death of John Graham (see under February 13, 1592-3) upon its author,
under circumstances similar to those which attended that slaughter. On
its being known that the earl was coming with his son and retinue to
Edinburgh, Sandilands was strongly recommended by some of his friends
to withdraw from the town, ‘because the earl was then over great a
party against him. His mind was, notwithstanding, sae undantonit,
and unmindful of his former misdeed, finding himself not sae weel
accompanied as he wald, he sent for friends, and convokit them to
Edinburgh, upon plain purpose rather first to invade the said earl than
to be invadit by him, and took the opportunity baith of time and place
within Edinburgh, and made a furious onset on the earl [at the Salt
Tron in the High Street], with guns and swords in great number.[201]
The earl, with his eldest son, defendit manfully, till at last Sir
James was dung [driven down] on his back, shot and hurt in divers parts
of his body and head, [and] straitly invadit to have been slain out
of hand, gif he had not been fortunately succoured by the prowess of
a gentleman callit Captain Lockhart. The lord chancellor and Montrose
were together at that time; but neither reverence [n]or respect was had
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account