Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
The ex-favourite was travelling by Symington, in the upper ward of
Lanarkshire, when some one who knew him gave him warning that he was
come into a dangerous neighbourhood, for not far from the way he was
about to pass dwelt a leading man of that house of Douglas which he
had mortally offended by his prosecution of the Regent Morton. This
was Sir James Douglas of Parkhead, whose father was a natural brother
of the regent: he was now the husband of the heiress of the house of
Carlyle of Torthorald, and a man of consideration. Stewart replied
disdainfully that he was travelling where he had a right to be, and he
would not go out of his way for Parkhead nor any other of the house of
Douglas. A mean person who overheard this speech made off and reported
it to Douglas, who, on hearing it, rose from table, where he had been
dining, and vowed he would have the life of Stewart at all hazards.
He immediately mounted, and with three servants rode after his enemy
through a valley called the Catslack. When Stewart saw himself pursued,
he asked the name of the place, and being told, desired his people to
come on with all possible speed, for he had got a response from some
soothsayer to beware of that spot. Parkhead speedily overtook him,
struck him from his horse, and then mercilessly killed him. Cutting
off the head, he caused it to be carried by a servant on the point of
a spear, thus verifying another weird saying regarding Stewart, that
he should have the highest head in Scotland. His body was left on the
spot, to become the prey of dogs and swine.[216]
Thus perished an ex-chancellor of Scotland, one who had been permitted
for a time to treat the world as if it had only been made for his own
aggrandisement, who had governed a king, struck down a regent, and made
the greatest of the old nobility of the country tremble. Violence,
insolence, and cruelty had been the ruling principles of his life,
and, as Spottiswoode says, ‘he was paid home in the end.’ No decided
effort was made to execute justice upon his slayer;[217] but it will be
afterwards found that the Ochiltree Stewarts did not forget his death.
(See under July 1608.)
* * * * *
[Sidenote: DEC. 17.
1596.]
An edict of the king against what he called unlawful convocations
of the clergy, had raised a general uneasiness and excitement, many
believing that all independent action of the clergy was struck at. The
prosecution of a minister named David Black, who had slandered the king
and queen in the pulpit, and refused to submit to a secular tribunal,
added to the turmoil. James had further raised a great distrust
regarding his fidelity to the Protestant religion by his allowing the
exiled papist lords to return to their own country. It was at this
crisis that the tumult long known in French fashion as the _Seventeenth
of December_ took place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account