Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)Chambers, Robert
History
Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 1 (of 2)
Chambers, Robert
Scotland -- History -- 16th century; Scotland -- History -- 17th century
The reformer considered these appearances as declarations of divine
wrath against the iniquity of the land, and he is evidently solicitous
to establish them upon good evidence. There can be no difficulty in
admitting the facts he refers to. The debate must be as to what the
facts were. Most probably they were resolvable into a simple example of
the _aurora borealis._
* * * * *
The crimes of unruly passion and of superstition predominated in this
age; but those of dexterous selfishness were not unknown.
[Sidenote: 1563-4.
FEB.]
Thomas Peebles, goldsmith in Edinburgh, was convicted of forging
coin-stamps and uttering false coin--namely, _Testons_, _Half-testons_,
_Non-sunts_, and _Lions_ or _Hardheads_. It appeared that he had given
some of his false hardheads to a poor woman as the price of a burden
of coal. With this money she came to the market to buy some necessary
articles, and was instantly challenged for passing false coin. ‘The
said Thomas being named by her to be her warrant, and deliverer of the
said false coin to her, David Symmer and other bailies of the burgh of
Edinburgh come with her to the said Thomas’s chalmer, to search him
for trial of the verity. He held the door of his said chalmer close
upon him, and wald not suffer them to enter, while [till] they brake up
the door thereof upon him, and entered perforce therein; and the said
Thomas, being inquired if he had given the said poor woman the said
lions, for the price of her coals, confessit the same; and his chalmer
being searched, there was divers of the said irons, as well sunken and
unsunken, together with the said false testons, &c., funden in the
same, and confessit to be made and graven by him and his colleagues.’
Thomas was condemned to be hanged, and to have his property escheat to
the queen.--_Pit._
* * * * *
[Sidenote: MAR. 22.]
In consequence of the slaughter of the Laird of Cessford, in an
encounter with the Laird of Buccleuch, at Melrose, in 1526, a feud
had ever since raged between their respective dependents, the Kerrs
and Scotts. In 1529, there had been an effort to put an end to this
broil by an engagement between Walter Kerr of Cessford, Andrew Kerr
of Ferniehirst, Mark Kerr of Dolphinston, George Kerr, tutor of
Cessford, and Andrew Kerr of Primsideloch, for themselves and kin on
the one part, and Walter Scott of Branxholm, knight, with sundry other
gentlemen of his clan on the other side, whereby the latter became
bound to perform the four pilgrimages of Scotland--that is, to the
churches of Melrose, Dundee, Scone, and Paisley--as a reparation for
the slaughter. Bad blood being nevertheless kept up, Sir Walter Scott
of Branxholm, Laird of Buccleuch, was slain on the streets of Edinburgh
by Cessford, in 1552.[25]
[Sidenote: 1563-4.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account