The French Constitution of 1791 was preceded by a bill of rights
declaring the equality and brotherhood of men, but a disqualification
for the right of suffrage, indeed, the only one, was “to be in a menial
capacity, _viz._, that of a servant receiving wages.” Title III.,
chap. 1, sec. 2. The Constitution of 1795, after a similar preamble,
states that the citizenship is suspended “by being a domestic on wages,
attending on the person or serving the house.” Title II., 13, 3. The
Constitution of 1799 has a similar disqualification. Title I., art. 5. It
is probable that these provisions were intended to punish men who would
consent to serve the nobility or the wealthy classes when it was expected
that all persons would be democratic enough to serve themselves, not to
cast discredit on domestic service _per se_.—Tripier, pp. 20, 105, 168.
During the revolutionary movement in Austria, the Hungarian Diet at its
session, in 1847-1848, passed an act providing that the qualification for
electors should be “to have attained the age of twenty years; Hungarians
by birth or naturalized; not under guardianship, nor in domestic service,
nor convicted of fraud, theft, murder, etc.” Act 5, sec. 2.—Stiles, II.,
376.
The qualifications for suffrage in England also excluded domestic
servants, but there was no discrimination against them as a class.
The Declaration of Independence, declaring all men free and equal in
the presence of African slavery, thus has its counterpart in these free
constitutions disfranchising domestic servants.
[185] Some of the figures given in this chapter have been taken from
advance sheets kindly furnished by the Census Bureau, and hence it is
impossible to give in every case page references.
[186] Preface, p. 1, and Appendix I.
[187] The percentage of foreign born as given here differs slightly from
that given on page 80, as it includes a small number of Chinese and
Japanese.
[188] Arizona, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New
Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island.
[189] Colorado, District of Columbia, Illinois, Michigan, Montana,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota,
Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
[190] Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi,
Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia.
[191] Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida,
Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia.
[192] _Eleventh Census_, Population, Part I., p. lxxxiii.
[193] _Census of Massachusetts_, 1885, Part II., p. 38.
[194] Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming.
[195] Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island,
Vermont.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account