(5) Is she faithful to her work, and is she trustworthy?
(6) In what capacity did she serve you, and how long?
(7) Was she capable and efficient in that capacity?”
The bureau states its aim to be “the recommendation of worthy persons
only.” The detailed form of the questions asked is more successful
in preventing an evasion of disqualifications, than is the personal
recommendation of a general character, which often tells the truth, but
not the whole truth.
One large bureau states that it formerly used blank forms, which it sent
out with each employee. Employers were asked to fill out these blanks
and return them at the end of service, and these were kept on file as
recommendations. It was soon found that employers grew lax and would not
take the pains to fill them out, and the practice was abandoned.
[233] DeFoe says, “To be a good Master is to be a Master that will do his
Servant Justice, and that will make his Servant do him Justice; he may be
kind to a Servant, that will let him sleep when he shou’d work, but then
he is not just to himself, or a good Governour to his Family.”—_Behaviour
of Servants_, p. 293.
[234] Repeated statements like the following are made by employers: “A
few wealthy families keep a large number of servants at high wages,
which wholly unfits them for general service and moderate wages, and
establishes customs and rates which cannot be met by the mass of people
with moderate incomes.”
[235] An employer recently engaged a cook at high wages with sufficient
recommendations it was supposed. The first dinner (an hour delayed)
showed her incapacity, and when questioned more closely it was found that
the only domestic work she had ever done was preparing vegetables in a
boarding house. When asked why she had engaged as a cook, the reply was,
“They told me I could get higher wages if I called myself a cook.” The
experience does not seem to be exceptional.
[236] An employer writes: “I find no place on the schedule for stating
that my cook and coachman have to-day each given notice of leaving unless
the other is discharged.”
[237] “When I began housekeeping in 1870 I had one ‘general housework
girl’ who stayed with me nine years. Now I consider myself fortunate to
retain a cook or a second girl as many weeks.”
“Thirty years ago I had no difficulty whatever. I do not think my
character has changed meantime, or my method of treating servants, or our
style of living, yet now it is almost impossible to secure servants.”
“The question is very different now from what it was forty years ago.”
“The problem in this place grows more perplexing every year.”
“Many housekeepers here are between the Scylla and Charybdis of trying to
tolerate wretched, inefficient servants, and the impossibility of getting
along with them.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account