The details of the history of domestic service during the colonial
period may seem unnecessary to an understanding of domestic service as
it is to-day, but an examination of them must show the existence during
that period of principles and conditions that must modify the judgment
concerning the conditions of to-day. No wish is more often expressed than
that it might be possible to return to the Arcadian days when service
was abundant, excellent, and cheap. But those days did not exist in
America during the colonial period. The conditions at that time bear
a marked resemblance to those of to-day. The social position of all
servants was lower than that of their employers, and the gulf between
the two was more difficult to span. Service was difficult to obtain and
unsatisfactory when secured. Servants complained of hard work and ill
treatment, and masters of ungrateful servants and inefficient service,
and both masters and servants were justified in their complaints. The
legal relations between master and servant were explicitly defined as
regards length of service, wages paid, and the mutual obligations of
both parties to the contract during the period of service. But this very
definiteness of the contract was due to the fact that the relationship
between the two parties was an arbitrary one and could not have been
preserved without this legal assistance. In default of a better one,
the system of white servitude may have served its age fairly well; but
its restoration, if the restoration were possible, would do nothing to
relieve in any way the strain and pressure of present conditions.
CHAPTER IV
DOMESTIC SERVICE SINCE THE COLONIAL PERIOD
It has been said that domestic service in America has passed through
three distinct phases. The second phase began about the time of the
Revolution, when at the North the indented servants as a class were
gradually supplanted by free laborers, and at the South by negro
slaves who inherited with large interest the reproach attached to the
redemptioners. The social chasm that had existed at the North between
employer and employee, under the system of bonded servants, disappeared.
The free laborers, whether employed in domestic service or otherwise,
were socially the equal of their employers, especially in New England
and in the smaller towns. They belonged by birth to the same section of
the country, probably to the same community; they had the same religious
belief, attended the same church, sat at the same fireside, ate at the
same table, had the same associates; they were often married from the
homes[150] and buried in the family lots of their employers.[151] They
were in every sense of the word “help.”[152] A survival of this condition
is seen to-day in farming communities, especially at the West. In the
South, on the contrary, the social chasm became impassable as negro
slavery entirely displaced white labor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account